I see that DMC has now converted to trying to measure size by income and similar meaningless drivel in place of arguing merit. It doesn't look like he is trying to compensate. Really.![]()
Your question made no sense.
I see that DMC has now converted to trying to measure size by income and similar meaningless drivel in place of arguing merit. It doesn't look like he is trying to compensate. Really.![]()
^Says the got who claimed he has me on ignore. Can't stop talking about me.
rent free
Your capitulation is duly noted.
Or was it the thought I put in parentheses that confused you?
I was able to read pusher's post easily. Reading is FUNdamental.
quitting when I challenged your income statement
6 figure salary(when they use that term you know the 1st figure is a 1)
Mine too else you couldn't have responded to what you just responded to.
got and a liar
I'm not the one equating social democracies with socialism, but it would be fairly disingenuous to state that, at least in the US, the connection isn't routinely made, at least when some aspect of the ideology applies. I think we agree in the sense that it shouldn't really be equated.
When it comes to ideologies or philosophies, it's actually pretty normal to see humans picking and choosing subsets. There's countless cases of people being conservative in economic policy and liberal in social policies (or some other combos), and there's nothing wrong with it. They would probably be called 'independents' or 'leaning-xxxx' or something else.
I tend to agree that socialism 'by the book' is largely unworkable, tbh, but, even though I prefer capitalism myself, it too fails regularly due to somewhat the same systemic problems (corruption seems to be the enemy of all systems, tbh). That's probably a different can of worms and a longer topic (and certainly touches other areas like fiscal conservatism), but let's just say the US is certainly fortunate to have won WWII, and only have sovereign debt...
good chat![]()
Marxism is socialism on paper. An actual democratic socialist govt wouldnt guarantee jobs for everyone, for example. Theres no escape from supply and demand, for the foreseeable future. The difference between capitalism and socialism is the transparency of private business when required a public eye. This is why overpowerful unions would not be socialist in practice. The union would be essential to business, and business the lawful automatic creator of unions. They should be checking and balancing eachother equally
You know he's upset when he starts rummaging through your post history. Good chat![]()
You answered you were alert while comfortably numb in Europe.
You tow the same basic conservative line. Label socialism to anything that scares you. Then find a story on a death in a Norwegian hospital to back up your claim.
"Get the government out of governing."
Just get to the point. Its easy for you.
. This Fuzzy fella sounds like a real bright prospect
![]()
Poor Fuzzy
Some people are apparently too stupid to figure out what the quote function does. The sense of accomplishment that was on display when I read your posts indicates that the function is still working properly. What a ing loser.
Yoni of course is there to fellate any blue team member making an effort.
Must have turned scripts back on. Just this time though, just this one time.![]()
6 figure salary![]()
Read your question again.
I never found any story of death an any Norwegian hospital. You try to fit everyone into neat little categories then accuse me of binary thinking.
I'm pretty sure you're suffering from some form of over indulgence somewhere along your lineage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)