Reply With Quote
You posted a story about UN resolutions.
That is not the nuclear deal.
iran broke nuclear deal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
search term
they broke it!
You posted a story about UN resolutions.
That is not the nuclear deal.
read it said BOTH
Iran Breaches the Nuclear Deal and UN Resolutions for Third Time
http://www.politifact.com/georgia/st...small-hiccups/
Says Iran has "violated the terms of the (nuclear) deal."
— Karen Handel on Thursday, June 8th, 2017 in a debate
We rate Handel’s statement Mostly False.
mostly false.
OK, why didn't Trump scrap the deal his first day in office and kept recertifying it?
Why do I think the American flag is worth defending? Why do I think the free market place is worth defending?
Mmmhmmm.
You didn't answer the question.
Why do you think Trump is worthy of defending here?
No one is attacking the flag here. No one is attacking the free market here.
Well, that's what Trump is standing up for, bro. I'm sorry you couldn't have deduced that.
Well, no one is attacking the flag or the free market when they kneel silently. I'm sorry you couldn't have deduced that. Only a ing moron would think that.
It's subjective. But the precedent is that this type of behavior is considered an afront to the nation. The people doing this are attention s who are to egomaniacal to be bothered with time and place.
Only to ing morons.By snowflakes and ing morons.But the precedent is that this type of behavior is considered an afront to the nation.They want to draw attention to a cause and ing morons don't get it or just want to distract from it.The people doing this are attention s who are to egomaniacal to be bothered with time and place.
By subjective, I mean it can at least be seen in both lights. All the same, only " ing morons" don't get that kneeling for the national anthem is disrespectful.....
Yea, they could wipe their asses with the flag to "draw attention to a cause" by that dumb logic.
That would be disrespecting the flag. Attacking it even. Kneeling silently isn't doing either. Only ing morons think it is.
Studies show that flags don't know if you're kneeling or not and cannot feel respect.
What you are objecting to is the refusal to participate in ceremonial patriotism. People are refusing to stand because they are expected and required to stand. "Disrespecting the flag" is idiot code.
Except they, of their own free will, signed an agreement with a franchise where they are required every game to be subjected to the national anthem. Why doesn't the protest happen during the signing?
Imagine, in your job at an office somewhere, the national anthem is played and you take a knee in front of the CEO, on national television because some dignitary is visiting your office. Would it be against your rights to terminate your employment?
CK said he'd stand for it if he could get signed again. His GF denies it but them's the rumors.
Attack is your word. I called it an afront to the nation, which it is.
Because the President of the United States didn't suggest they should be fired for disrespecting signing day.
And because they're not interested in what you deem to be an appropriate time to make a statement.
Did it hurt to push that scenario out of your ass?Imagine, in your job at an office somewhere, the national anthem is played and you take a knee in front of the CEO, on national television because some dignitary is visiting your office. Would it be against your rights to terminate your employment?
Fwiw, I would not be fired for doing that and I can't imagine working in a place where I would be.
Of course it had nothing to do with getting paid first then protesting what they knew they were signing up for after the fact.
Again, like protesting a war after joining the military voluntarily.
Did it hurt to push that scenario out of your ass?
Fwiw, I would not be fired for doing that and I can't imagine working in a place where I would be.
Spurminator nuked. Pavlov too really.Of course it had nothing to do with getting paid first then protesting what they knew they were signing up for after the fact.
Again, like protesting a war after joining the military voluntarily.
Only ing moron snowflakes think that.
There is no requirement to forego your living in order to demonstrate.
Nothing wrong with that either.Again, like protesting a war after joining the military voluntarily.
You're the one who brought up the random office scenario, smarty. If my employer had reason to believe I would be uncomfortable participating in a ceremonial display of patriotism, and that my discomfort could cause an incident that would paint the company in a bad light, they'd excuse me from the ceremony. I can't imagine working anywhere where that wouldn't be the case. Especially if this was something that happened every week.
Anyway, where in your fictional scenario do we get to the part where the President repeatedly says that I should be fired and the VP shows up at my office for a pre-planned exit five minutes later? Or are those things not as relevant as flags and millionaire n!ggers?
Definition of affront
transitive verb
1 a :to insult especially to the face by behavior or language
- He was affronted by her rudeness.
b :to cause offense to
- laws that affront society
2 a :to face in defiance :confront
- affront death
b obsolete :to encounter face-to-face
3 :to appear directly before
Only snowflakes and ing morons think that. And people can be both.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
