Reply With Quote
No one is asking for perfection. Just not 1-12.
Amazing how so many people underestimate Parker’s athleticism. For many years he was the fastest player in the league. He also has outstanding body control. There are areas athleticism-wise where Murray has him beat, not others, but Parker was a world class athlete
No one is asking for perfection. Just not 1-12.
Yeah prime Parker could get to the paint at will. I hope he comes back from this injury with a chip on his shoulder.
Because the spurs play for regular season wins
Okay. Enjoy enjoying nothing.
I hope Parker enjoys his new bench role. David, Manu, and Tim all adjusted to reduced roles as they got older.
Porker ain't selfless though. Dude is gonna be crying on the bench.
Parker is better than Murray. Unless DeJounte completely owns the defensive end, I don't think there's any justification to start him over Tony.
Word. Love to crack open a beer with you while you relish mediocrity.
What about developing Murray for the future?
No chips. We don't need him gaining weight again.
Look at this guy. Leave the emojis for your facebook post. Anyone who thinks murray is a legit pg has no concept of the position. He cant initiate the offense regularly, hes sloppy with his ball handling and passing turnovers. His one skill is his ability to attack the rim. He will be good if he learns fundamentals and corrects his highlight mentality. Right now hes a spark player not a core player
If the team performs well with Dijon there’s no reason to sit him for Tony either. If he regreses or hits a wall that’s different. Even then Pop lets his veterans be streaky too. Tony is going to get injured again unfortunately. Only Dijon can take himself out of this race IMO
Lol out of hiding. Use more emojis... to be drafted as a pg with no ability to do anything but iso and transition is a problem. Will he get better, yep, but that was never my argument. My argument was and still is, hes too dumb to run on offense when it matters. To come in and score when spurs are lulling l, sure. To act like hes a legit pg, or even in the same world as parker is stupidity. Parker at 19 made dj at 21 look like a jv scrub.Yet throlden didn't see that all. He kept bashing Murray about him not being an NBA player. Which anyone could see the clear capability that Murray has. Now throlden is nowhere to be found, hoping that Murray will have a bad game so he can come back out of hiding
Parker is better than Murray. Even typical Tony is better than the Murray we saw on Wednesday. It wasn't like DeJounte came it and ran the offense while Tony was away. He, Gay, Manu and Anderson all switched off bringing the ball up the court. In the half-court, even Green did more to get LMA involved than Murray. The team has won games where Gary Neal has started, so the idea that DeJounte has to "lose" the spot from Parker falls flat to me. I'm not even sure that Murray isn't the third PG still.
porker has been for a couple of years in the regular season and playoffs and is injury prone. Yes he is injury prone. All the ing time. After this injury, he isn't going to be the same or better and he wasn't good to begin with. He is a piece of player now.
Last preseason I said to give the keys to Murray because he needs the reps and Tony is a piece of injury prone player. The reps will be wasted on tony. happens every year and people pretend like they didn't know.
They werent wasted. Had tp and kl been injury free spurs would have been in the finals.Last preseason I said to give the keys to Murray because he needs the reps and Tony is a piece of injury prone player. The reps will be wasted on tony. happens every year and people pretend like they didn't know.
but he is injury prone you piece of got.
Didn't you just hear me say that.
Quick add more emojis and name call because i cant argue my own point. Still awesome at analysis i seebut he is injury prone you piece of got.
Didn't you just hear me say that.
My point was based on facts and history. Your point was based on illusion.
Was it the emoji that made your statement more believable?My point was based on facts and history. Your point was based on illusion.
It was the fact.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
