No, it is not. Why can you not give me any outright reason for sanctioning Iran's nuclear capabilities? You think it's a good idea to sanction a crime-ridden actor's nuclear capabilities? What do you think we attained by doing so?
That's not saying what you think he should not have done.
What are you saying Obama should have done?
The goal is to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
No, it is not. Why can you not give me any outright reason for sanctioning Iran's nuclear capabilities? You think it's a good idea to sanction a crime-ridden actor's nuclear capabilities? What do you think we attained by doing so?
We attained a eight-country+EU agreement that keeps Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
Duh.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
Aw, DMC's only talking about me.
Again.
Unless someone can prove Obama was acting in bad faith to the American people, nothing probably is gonna happen to him.![]()
Well, since you want to speak of the agreement as a blazing success, let's look at it:
* Did you know that before negotiations, the Obama administration insisted that Iran stop all uranium enrichment? What changed?
* In the agreement, there is no mechanism for reducing Iran's stockpiles of "peaceful energy" nuclear rods.
* Instead of cutting back centrifuges from 1,500 to 500, Iran is now at 6,104.
* Iran was allowed to keep the Anrak facility, which is non-pivotal to their "peaceful" nuclear energy program. The facility can produce enough plutonium to create two bombs a year.
* Little is known of the Fordow facility and their potential capabilities. Their ability to create a bomb is unknown and could already exist or otherwise soon exist. Also, the facility's mountainous enclosure makes it defensible against aerial assaults.
* Iran was required not to stop or curb their intercontinental ballistic missile development.
* The (quick) expiration of the deal ultimately enables Iran to become nuclear military power, according to Henry Kissinger.
* Nuclear inspections are not anytime, anywhere, meaning it will be quite easy for Iran to mask their nuclear weapon development efforts.
* Iran relieved of sanctions while making little to no significant concessions.
* Iran's propaganda of America being 'The Great Satan' continues unimpeded. Meanwhile, their own criminal activities abound.
* https://www.usnews.com/opinion/artic...greement-fails
You didn't answer the question.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
Link is listed, dink.
Now, tell me what you think was so great about Obama sanctioning and even enabling Iran's nuclear capabilities. Could it be that you don't have a good answer?
Still plagiarism according to you.
Already answered.Now, tell me what you think was so great about Obama sanctioning and even enabling Iran's nuclear capabilities. Could it be that you don't have a good answer?
You never answered mine:
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
I said posting something in it's entirety is plagiarism / copyright infringement. But I summarized the points and gave the source for you.
Certainly Obama shouldn't have signed that agreement "instead". He created pretty much the worst possible outcome, honestly.
Now tell me what you think is good about that deal; why should we have agreed to it? Clearly, I listed many downfalls from just the one source. I imagine there are yet many others, too.
Plagiarism, according to you.
I didn't ask you what you think he shouldn't have done.Certainly Obama shouldn't have signed that agreement "instead". He created pretty much the worst possible outcome, honestly.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
I just told you, numb nuts that Obama should not have signed the agreement. Now, tell me why you think the agreement was good. This is a handful of times that you have chosen to not answer that. I don't believe you have a good answer for that, unless you somehow count that other nations capitulated as a good answer.
I didn't ask you what you think he shouldn't have done.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
Do you understand what he is asking you? Should I explain it? Do you know what English is?
Okay, I'll tell you, after you tell me what you think we got out of the deal. Can you even do that, panty waste?
Nope, you're behind on the question count. No new questions til you answer this one I have already asked you several times.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
Can you even answer that?
You want to have an existential distraction rather than actually make a tangible case for why the Iranian nuclear agreement was worthwhile. This illustrates that you know the deal was . Congratulations, sperm shielder.
Nope, I want you to answer this one (1) question:
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
Will you be making a case for the nuclear agreement if I answer that question?
Sure.
Now, what are you saying Obama should have done about it instead?
It always seems to me like spurtacular never has any takes on anything.![]()
Either you ing man up, or stop ing.![]()
He's furiously trying to find something to plagiarize.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)