Reply With Quote
Yep. Just like I said. You are completely ignorant.
ellison. i don't care if he hit a woman, ed a dude, is a vegan, or flew to the moon. i don't care. i just find the outrage over SpecialK sickening especially when the other side, ellison, had a police report written up on him, photos of the abuse, etc and yet we're just supposed to believe this lefty activist and her 35+ yr old story of make believe but not ellison's accuser/ex?
we know where you stand... you stand against all republicans and those who don't subscribe to the left. that's it. you don't care about discussion; you only care about trying to gain the upper hand however you can with your shtick.
Yep. Just like I said. You are completely ignorant.
awesome how you left out the following... "i just find the outrage over SpecialK sickening especially when the other side, ellison, had a police report written up on him, photos of the abuse, etc and yet we're just supposed to believe this lefty activist and her 35+ yr old story of make believe but not ellison's accuser/ex?"
you're too easy to figure out pavTHETIC. you think you're a 10000 piece puzzle but you're simply a kids 5 piece puzzle instead.
What is the abuse Ellison is accused of?
emotional and physical abuse... getting dragged off her bed and probably worse but it's up to her to give more details as per her son.
i don't see much as far as physical abuse but we also don't know what she might not have stated yet.
ellison could be right and or he could be wrong.
either way, pinning SpecialK as a rapist is comical when ellison actually had a police report against him for abuse but SpecialK just has some old hag far left activist throwing accusations that not even one of her friends/witnesses lays claim to.
yall far lefty's are all the same.
I'm in full support of both being investigated.
Attempted bed pulling. Attempted sexual assault.
one has evidence and the other is 35+ yrs later with no one backing that activists accusations. what are you going to investigate when it comes to SpecialK especially if all 4 witnesses have already stated ford is a ing loon living in an activists make believe world?
Why not leave it up to the FBI to make that determination?
Why are you the sole arbiter of what merits investigation?
the fbi this and the fbi that... it's not the job of the fbi to investigate sexual assault cases. sorry but i thought you knew everything pavTHETIC?
It's the job of the FBI to do the background check. Sorry.
Just like their outrage over sketchy details and vague memories while rape kits with DNA evidence gather dust on shelves.
lol more distraction
how many should they do to appease you? would 20 work? i mean, considering you don't think 5 background checks are enough then 20 probably isn't a number you're comfortable with either. so 1000 then?
see your lunacy yet?
btw, hahaha got ya with that fbi investigation mr egomaniac!
This one will be just fine.
It's their job, they should finish it.
Should only take a few days.
you're making my case for dissolving the fbi more and more. this background check will suffice but not the 5 prior. so they're incompetent by all measures, even yours.
The prior ones did not include this current accusation.
It's really, really simple.
so they didn't do their job then... if it's not thorough enough to dig up a supposed sexual assault after 1 background check then that agency because they're worthless.
you're totally missing the point btw but keep supporting my theory that the fbi is incompetent if you must.
How would they dig up this charge, kori?
Magic?
Mind reading?
Tarot cards?
Explain.
if they ain't digging far enough then they aren't doing their jobs. it's as clear as that right there. they aren't your local PD, they're the ing fbi.
how'd they know russia was hacking in the election when it was the dhs? must've been them mind reading tarot card wielding magicians of the fbi hard at work.
How are they supposed to investigate an accusation that has not been made, kori?
Explain.
you just don't get it and i never thought you would anyhow. you're a faux intellect whose ego has him thinking he's some sort of golden god but instead you're just little ol' pavTHETIC.
So you can't explain how the FBI is supposed to investigate an accusation has not been made.
OK. I knew you couldn't.
i'm not the fbi nor do i know how extensive their training is when it comes to background checks but you must know because you sure act like you've read their handbooks and whatnot.
my belief is, if it took them 5 background checks, numerous people interviewed, and still never came across this dirt then what makes that agency worth a ? regardless of a accusation, i wouldn't doubt they've interviewed those 4 witnesses, who all dismiss ford's claims, in the past.
so in essence, the fbi is as worthless as you are.
You are ignorant of what cons utes an FBI background check for judicial nominees.
You are worthless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions