true, you could probably narrow that list down even further tbh
You may believe that, but I don't - why would they have put $50 million in front of him if they didn't think he was a starter...
true, you could probably narrow that list down even further tbh
I told ya to sticky this thread to stop things like this: https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...15#post9569315
"Best pg on the Spurs: good on ya Patty".
Patty is awful. At least Pops obsession with Matt Bonner made sense in the regular season. But the Patty experiment should have ended in 2016 when he was useless against OKC.
Patty with the game winner lol
makes a winning basket, but is responsible for the lakers to get back in the game, so you guys going to forget all of that?
^^^ true. Gave up two and ones in crunch time could’ve easily cost us the game
Just proves that no, Patty is not complete garbage. He's only 98% garbage.
yup
G'DAYYY MATE!!!!
Man that ain't true at all lol. The execution late in the game cost us. DDR couldn't hit a shot or draw a foul
PG is the easiest position to fill in today's NBA. For the Spurs to have such an awful PG rotation is inexcusable. Yeah, it sucked about Murray's injury but the fact that we still have to rely on Mills is laughable. Of all the positions in the league, finding a competent PG is a dime a dozen.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)