Reply With Quote
Dumbass^ thinks the people spoke in '92 and '96 but not in '94, '00 & '04.
Conservative^ russle up some controversy in the last time the democrats won(96.) I suppose you'll say it's because righties aren't conspiracy theorists.
Dumbass^ thinks the people spoke in '92 and '96 but not in '94, '00 & '04.
Some people spoke in all of those years, but there is something to these voting scandals(2000 and 2004.) Rich people speak the loudest.
Oddly enough, a number of "rich people" support left-wing candidates and causes...
Let's not look forward to do anything to fix it or find a better process or anticipate other future problems ... let's just sit here and about what may or may not have already happened a year ago.Let's forget the past, what about the future? In 2006 we'll still have some states using these same untrackable, manipulatable paper-less ballots.
Oddly enough the owners of the computer voting systems happen to be conservatives and some even promise to deliver states(Ohio) to Bush.
I've moved on and am content on who I voted for.
Oddly enough, DEAD people can punch a ballot!
Yeah, Democrats have never committed vote fraud. This left-wing alternate reality certainly is fun...
Because it's much better to say "ahh whatever, can't do anything now" and hope it doesn't keep happening. It won't stop happening if the scandal(if it is indeed true) is publicized to the people. It must be on CBS before anyone believes that it holds some water.
Your point is don't about anything that has already happened, I'll remember to remind you later.
Huh? Did you even understand what I said?
Oh brother. The last two elections have mostly likely been the most scrutenized of any election EVER held on the face of this planet. They have been gone over with fine toothed combs and those combs been disected and studied as well. Is that a bad thing? Not to me. Does fraud occur? Sure! Do anyone actually believe that there is more voter fraud than there was throughout the history of the US by percentage? Is electronic voting possibly a good tool to use to aid in achieving higher voter turn out and a greater confidence in the voting establishment in general? I believe so. With the proper oversight, and a well managed system, this is progress for us all.
There will be another democratic president.....all in good time.
Yes, and Bush can go back on vacation, permanantly.
Not if they don't get their together and come up with a plan that will attract some moderates they won't ... not anytime soon.
What does this have to do with me?
I beg to differ. More and more people ..even conservatives..are wising up to this administration's tactics and policies. I remember when many said Bill didn't have a chance against poppa Bush.
and it's not like this administration has their together either...but that is just me.
I don't know that the Left is attracting any moderates/conservatives as much as the Bush Administration is alienating them. Kind of like 1992... When people who were fed up with Bush1 voted for Ross Perot.
This administration can't run again. And I never said I thought they did have their together....but as long as the Dems keep putting extremist on the ballot whose platform is how bad the other guy is, not what they have to offer...FORGET IT.
"how bad the other guy is,"
negative campaigning works. Repubs know/practice that as thoroughly as anybody.
The voters say they hate it, say there's too much of it, but they vote it.
Your thread decrying the popular reasons that Democrats have been unsuccessful in 00 and 04. Well, now it turns out that Democrats likely won both elections.
Joe's right. For Republicans this is turning into 1992 all over again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions