Reply With Quote
Okay, them. Who should we get our information from instead?
did i say that? btw, the whole dennison shtick is stupid too.
Okay, them. Who should we get our information from instead?
Do you trust Trump?
Yes or no.
not at all. our news networks! there's people on the internet doing real journalism and not strictly pol activism.
lmao the yes or no shtick. want to see how many circles we can go in now? your demands me nothing to me just like yourself pav. you truly are a re .
Which people on the internet are doing real journalism?
kori.
What a sissy.
def not you.
Which people on the internet are doing real journalism?
Name them.
I'd love to read their work.
Since when has this conversation ever just been about TV news networks? I never watch TV news. The press corps is not made up of exclusively TV journalists.
Who should we get our information from if not the press, Kori?
how am i a sissy? if i told you to knock off your stupid shtick over and over again what makes you think i'm going to all of a sudden play your stupid ing games? you're a re and you know it.
What a sissy.
No wonder you post so much. On top of the anger issues you have a really hard time communicating ideas.
You can't answer simple questions and instead meltdown.
i'm not naming anyone i read, watch, etc and you know why? because i think very low of you and many here too and just don't give a about yall enough to list anything yall demand. i've come to the conclusion that you and i, a few others, are never going to see eye to eye on anything so i'm done playing that game now. time to just on you whenever given the chance like yall do to me. i'm truly here for the lulz now and til the end of time.
you still have no clue what a meltdown is tbh. it's funny though. keep using terms you have no clue about if you must.
you've doubled my post count... dip
We could come closer to seeing eye to eye if you told us about all that great journalism you're reading but hiding from us for some reason.i'm not naming anyone i read, watch, etc and you know why? because i think very low of you and many here too and just don't give a about yall enough to list anything yall demand. i've come to the conclusion that you and i, a few others, are never going to see eye to eye on anything so i'm done playing that game now. time to just on you whenever given the chance like yall do to me. i'm truly here for the lulz now and til the end of time.
Then just answer simple questions, sissy.
nope, this has gone on well over a yr now with you and you've made no attempt at being genuine at all. idgaf about you alive nor dead holmes. and i really don't give a about trying to be cordial with you anymore either.
you could easily end this thread derailment if you politely just move along but that ego won't let you. you're a sad excuse of a man.
18 x 2 is not 30. I joined 5 years earlier. But total posts wasn't what I was referencing. Your recent post frequency is objectively a lot higher. That's not necessarily a bad thing, except it seems to take you 25 posts to reach a point, if you ever do reach one.
Are you going to answer my question about where we should get our information if not from the press?
kori and pavlov
all the sudden you become a forum cop when you're asked about your fabulous news sources.
Who, in your opinion, is doing the best journalistic work on the internet?
a forum cop lmao! i've been telling you the same for over a yr now; you're a ing pussy ass re and you should just stfu and know your place.
Who, in your opinion, is doing the best journalistic work on the internet?
same , different day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions