Reply With Quote
School started:spurs_fan_in_exile
your funny , do you do stand up?
Themanrules
great post, you should write for the san antonio lightning, but you know deep down inside the Spurs have no answer for the 2005-2006 Dallas Mavericks.
as far as talking smack this soon? it's not mouse's fault the Spurs played Dallas this early, I am sure if the Spurs would have waxed the Mavericks this site would be just as excited, maybe even more. But you do bring up many good points, the only problem is? your a little to late, the points where needed Saturday night,
you are is spelled you're when you want to use a contraction, too late not to late, and were not where. As you appear to have great difficulties in reading and writing, this is probably pointless.
Go back and read my post and answer the points I made in a reasonable way and show how your premise that Alice is a better team than the Spurs and that Alice will get past the Spurs in the playoffs.
You never answered the points that I made. Until you do (which you can't in any reasonable and/or convincing way- convincing to most analysts or fans), you are showing that you know that what I am saying is true.
Because the Mavericks won the third game of the year at home against us, therefore, the Mavericks are better than us is logically flawed. By this line of reasoning, we end up in numerous contradictions. Numerous times, one bad or mediocre team has beaten a better team by a large margin. I can give you examples if you want them. This would force you into ridiculous positions. When you deny the logical conclusions of your argument, you are showing that you yourself know it's invalid. Hasty generalization.
Is it my fault that my classes have kept me busy? The truth is the truth, regardless of time.
What basketball analyst thinks that the Mavs are better than the Spurs and will advance past the Spurs in the playoffs? Name some.
The overwhelming majority of objective fans (not connected to either team) would disagree with both of these propositions. Why is this the case?
Suppose that Dallas loses by 19 points to some sorry team, like NOK Hornets or the Bobcats or the Hawks, does that mean that one of those teams is better than Alice?
If Spurs beat Utah handily, then the Spurs are greater than Utah which is greater than Alice.
Spurs have lost by a large margin to sorry teams before, but won a championship. Thus, one can use a counterexample to disprove your thesis (one bad loss means the Spurs are not as good as the team they lost to and won't win the championship). Avoid using special pleading while avoiding the conclusion which the counterexample leads to.
So, whatever conclusion you draw from Alice winning one game at home by a large margin, you clearly cannot rely upon it to take you to where you want to go with it.
What I want to know is: whose defense is worse, your defense or Alice's?Probably, the best way to answer the question is to say that neither of the two teams even tries to play defense. That's a major part of the reason why neither of your teams has won a championship.
Any one night, a jumpshooting team may catch on fire, especially at home. However, in a 7 game series, they normally do not fare well. Demonstrate how Alice is actually a team which has strong low post scorers.
I notice that you all have not won any championships either. There is a reason for this. Show how the Mavericks are a championship caliber team when they have never won a championship. For part b, do this also for the Suns.
You must be a member of the flat earth society. This not only follows from your numerous spelling problems, but your propagation on indefensible positions.
Will the Suns make the playoffs? I can't affirm that. Alice in the playoffs? Maybe.
Only absolute idiots think that Alice is better than the Spurs or will get past the Spurs in the playoffs.
Spurs: 3 Alice 0
Spurs: 3 Alice 0
If you want us to think that you are our equals, it might help if you had bothered to accomplish something (win some championships).
You must be a cokehead.
