I checked him out real quick.
My preliminary eval of Quickley is this:
A quicker version of Forbes. I say this because he doesn't flash many offensive moves besides the spot up 3, floater (looks more efficient than Forbes). He doesnt look like he can be creative out of an ISO like Mason can. Whenever I look at prospects, I look for an eye popping skill and so far I don't see one. He can pass better than Forbes.

Reply With Quote
That's amazing. Thanks for posting. I love Bane. Right now, like at this moment, there is nothing that Bryn Forbes does that Bane couldn't do better. I guess Forbes knows the Spurs' "system" - assuming that still even exists, but that's about it. I think he could be a really good NBA player, but there are some physical stats floating around that are either cause for worry or cause to draft him in the lottery.