Reply With QuoteI'd probably trade either for Kwame; he's got gobs of upside and never had anyone who could develop him. I think he could really flourish here with the treatment he'd get from the staff and vets.
So could Haywood and Thomas...
I think Ghost was only curious about everone's opinion on a Kwame Brown pickup. While it does sound enticing, I have a feeling that the Wiz won't give up on Kwame just yet, especially now that king Jordan and pyscho Doug Collins are no longer in the fold. This upcoming year could be a new experience for the young and developing Brown.
I'd probably trade either for Kwame; he's got gobs of upside and never had anyone who could develop him. I think he could really flourish here with the treatment he'd get from the staff and vets.
So could Haywood and Thomas...
I don't like the idea of Kwame.
He's a project still IMO. Tony's anything but, and we should expect anything but in return if it comes to that.
AHF
They should take a look at what kind of offers there are for Clax. I don't think that they would find that much better than Haywood...too many teams have the exception which they can offer for Claxton. The situation would be one where a team wants to sign someone else and wants to do a S&T. Haywood might not be a bad idea as a young 'project' big.
Why not trade Parker for Vin Baker..that way it won't take you guys a year to figure out we made a stupid ing trade.
Whottt, do you own a trench coat?
Whott, if Jason Kidd came to the Spurs, Kwame Brown would be a more vital performer for our team than Tony Parker would.
I don't expect a dope homer like you to understand the risk/reward to bringing in an unpolished big man for an extraneous PG.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions