You might have a point there, but the majority in this thread take the side against Sheehan as well. Since Bush and company did know she was attending beforehand, it doesn't sit right with me.
Can someone please tell me what strategic sense it would make for Republicans to have her thrown out or arrested without cause? , even WITH cause?
I think the most important question is on the first page. Why was she invited? It's almost like this whole thing was planned from the beginning, and I'm not sure why it would be planned by someone who did not agree with her cause.
Like others here have posted, I object to Cindy's methods and the obviously ridiculous statements I have heard from here.
As for her war views, I am still developing my opinion. Anyone have a copy of her book they could loan me?
I can't say whether I think her ideas or wrong until I have heard more from her.
what are we talking about ? acrazy woman who is hanging out with Hugo Chavez and leftist wackos like Belafonte and Danny GLover? A woman so crazy and whacked out of her mind that Hillary doesn't even associate with her anymore and the reverands have since distanced themselves from her because she is a LOOOOOON
And the labeling goes. Bush is the trouble maker. That's what she protests , and she's called crazy for it.
Good post Nbadan.
Oh Dan, you just crack me up!However, Cindy just keeps trumping them at every turn. Everytime they stick a mic in her grill she manages to say the right things. Now if America was only listening.When has Cindy EVER managed to say the right thing? When she said we needed to get the troops out of occupied New Orleans? When she appeared with Hugo Chavez? When she said the President was the biggest terrorist in the world?
America is not listening because she's a nutcase! However, Diane Feinstein should welcome the compe ion from Cindy because Cindy makes Feinstein look normal!
I like how the spin continues. It's simple. 2 people wore shirts that supposedly are against the law to be worn in the Capitol building.
One for Bush, one against. One bruised and arrested, the other given choice to leave on her own peacefully, not arrested.
Guess which one was arrested.
But continue with all the spin, please, proceed.
No - Bush is the President. And will be for the next 3 years! A fact I love and the loony libs hate!Bush is the trouble maker
What did your post do to change the fact that Cindy was arrested and the Republican's wife wasn't, both for the same crime?
the one who should be in a straight jacket and has a knack for elaborating a tad bit on the truth
Probably the one who was a bigger nuisance. But I guess it depends on whose account you're more likely to believe.One for Bush, one against. One bruised and arrested, the other given choice to leave on her own peacefully, not arrested.
Guess which one was arrested.
Again, what strategic benefit would beating up a public anti-war activist have for the Bush administration?
To teach her a lesson?
So, you're saying she shouldn't have any liberties by labeling her crazy?
I don't know that causing a disruption at the State of the Union address is a protected civil liberty.
Hmm, both sides of the aisle at some point in the past decided any signs of protest/support, whatever in the Capitol rotunda were illegal.I do not believe Sheehans civil liberties should be obstructed, I do not believe that Sheehan should have been forcefully removed.
And now you're pissed because she owned herself before the speech even started? Wake the up.
What is it called to be arrested and bruised, and a Republicans wife not being arrested or bruised for the same thing?
Yeah, Hugo Chavez is a smart man we should all follow. , he should be our next presidentEverytime they stick a mic in her grill she manages to say the right things. Now if America was only listening.Talk about insight from that woman!
If they wanted to teach her a lesson they would have killed her. That's what the Clintons did with the Whitewater folks.To teach her a lesson?
Did you mean wake the Funke up?
Maybe because the Republican's wife was asked and agreed, whereas Sheehan probably told them to off and refused to move. I love how you take her version as gospel. This just in - she has an agenda.What is it called to be arrested and bruised, and a Republicans wife not being arrested or bruised for the same thing?
no i am saying she is a product of her own actions - and I am saying I didn't see any extreme force being used on the footage I saw. Yet you freely believe they took her in the back room off camera and rodney kinged her ?
For the love of God the woman has a few "lose" screws, can the Dems please find someone else.
I didn't say they Rodney Kinged her. She says that they rushed her out and arrested her without asking her to leave or cover it up, and has bruises to prove it.
However, the other woman was supposedly asked to leave on her own, and not arrested, but yet she committed the same crime.
That's the weakest answer I could have imagined from you.
Seriously. Put your expert political strategist thinking cap on and list reasons why arresting Sheehan for no good reason and putting her back in the national news is in the best interest of Republicans. Every good conspiracy theory has a good motive.
I don't think she's been adopted as the voice of the democratic party by anyone other than Repugs. She can pretty much say whatever she wants about Bushie and the war. If you don't like what she says, don't listen.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote