And here is the thread.
Again, you REALLY don't have to lie.
Really?
Here are all the posts where I have used the word "manlove."
The quote you attributed to me does not exist.
And here is the thread.
Again, you REALLY don't have to lie.
I take it Yonivore and gtown you would be in favor of restrictive gun laws, or banning guns all together. It's all about saving precious lives isn't it?
![]()
Don't worry Chump, gaytown makes those sexualty references to everyone.
S-He can't help it. S-he is what s-he is. Everyone knows about her constant gay insults and fantasies to others. Just don't ever hint on this board where you live cuz I wouldn't feel safe. S-He does seem pretty obsessed and stalker-like.
![]()
Well, if guns just spontaneously killed 1.5 people a year, sure.
What purpose does a gun have other than killing?
Regardless I already knew what your answer was going to be. Thanks for affirming your hypocrisy.
Self defense, protection, food, and sport...to name four.
You betcha.
![]()
Yes, I love it when I'm right.
Hey Yoni boy, why are you Yoni anyway?
are you tired?
Anyway, we need more sissy's like you to spin subjects.
It's what me and my administrations do best.
Heck of a job Yoni boy.
God Bless America![]()
I know this doesn't speak directly to the abortion vs. arms-bearing question but, the principle is the same.
Same argument. The right to bear arms is explicitly protected by the 2nd amendment. Tell me where abortion is explicitly protected.
You weren't arguing cons utional merit, you said abortion was murder. Are we to believe that if the cons ution allowed abortions you would be fine with it?
it's what I do best![]()
I'm glad some of you want to save us from all those wicked women who keep getting pregnant just to get another abortion at the convenience store.
I'd be hard pressed to argue against it. But, the cons ution doesn't explicitly allow it. Pro-abortionists had to do some fairly fancy lawyering to get a liberal Supreme Court to agree. It would take similary fancy lawyering to get the Supreme Court to agree to strike down a person's right to keep and bear arms.
But, the Cons ution does say a person has the right to their life, their liberty, and their property. That is explicit. Pro-abortionists can only get around that by claiming unborn children aren't people.
That's tough when you've got all those pregnant moms joining registries and stuff.
So all that about murder and morality, that was all bull . If its the law then you support it or at least won't disagree with it.
You do realize that the Supreme Court is the law of the land. The only thing that can overturn one of their rulings is a cons utional amendment.
Make up your ing mind are you a moralist or a cons utionalist.
You're forgetting; it's the law now dumbass, and I'm neither supporting or agreeing with it.
I was referring to the fact I'd be hard pressed to argue agains the cons utionality of it if it was explicitly permitted.
Or a subsequent ruling. And, no, they are not the law of the land...the law is the law of the land; passed by Congress and signed by the President.
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. You're proposition was based on a non-existent "what if." Most of the moral failings of the cons ution have been resolved by amendments.
Wow, i'm the girl in this forun,..., you are full of yourself. what a ing hypocrite you are calling me a stalker cuz it is your fake ass who seems to post after every post i type. And then now your trying to call me a girl, nice try , but it was you who nobody could guess your gender. But that's cool, you ran out of insults to throw at me so you started to use my tactics. What a in fool.
I dont have to call you a stalker, its pretty evident that the majority of the time you post, it is in reference to something I said. I just wish you could put away your mancrush towards me.
Here is the thread where Chump a dumper aka CLeveland Steamer stated and implied that he was the manlove forum moderator.
Read posts #'s 10 and 11. If you see there i first called scott the ManLove Forum Moderator, but then Cleveland Steamer stole the le himself and admitted that he was the ManLove Moderator.
[URL=http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=589579&highlight=manlove#post5895 79]
Here is the transcript...
Gtownspur(in reference to Scott's post): you must be the Manlove Moderator.
ChumpDumper: Nah, that's me. I'm pretty permissive with the schoolgirl crushes, though.
************************************************** ********
I didnt bring it up... Scott did.
gtown, texas
How'd you learn to be a wimp like me?
We are alike you and me, we like sendin' others to fight a war we wouldn't
fight ourselves. That's the Republican way boy.
God Bless America![]()
Oh Great,
Cyber George is back.
You use to be subtle about poking fun at GW, i dont know what happened. Did he your mother or something?
Look , I posted the linl to the entire thread a day before you and proved you lied about the DIRECT QUOTE you attributed to me.
Accept your beating and move on.
And so what, i posted the direct link to the thread where everything could be seen bright as day. The link you posted doesnt show the whole argument, but snipets so it's misleading. You did claim the le to Manlove Moderator, i have nothing to hide, everyone can see it here..
[URL=http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=589579&highlight=manlove#post5895 79]
^^^gaytownspur never knows what she's talking about.
Dude quit stalking me.
You're a little perverted old hag.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)