Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 135
  1. #76
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    , I'd even take Veal from them if they cough Pierce.

    Manu
    Horry
    Barry
    Williams
    Oberto

    Pierce
    "Veal" LaFrentz

    Boston would ing love Manu for those 70 games he plays per year, and the rest would be gone soon.

    Veal was a good shotblocker and rebounder until Nellie got ahold of him, averaging close to 3 blocks and 7-8 boards per contest over a 3 year span. He can also stretch your defense. The only other players I've seen with that combination of shotblocking and 3 point marksmenship were Jonathan Bender and Eddie Griffin.

  2. #77
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Right...Pierce only has value to a contender IMO...and how many contenders can offer what the Spurs can?

  3. #78
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    Wrong honky.

  4. #79
    I M Ultimate Badass Quadzilla99's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    2,817
    , I'd even take Veal from them if they cough Pierce.

    Manu
    Horry
    Barry
    Williams
    Oberto

    Pierce
    "Veal" LaFrentz

    Boston would ing love Manu for those 70 games he plays per year, and the rest would be gone soon.

    Veal was a good shotblocker and rebounder until Nellie got ahold of him, averaging close to 3 blocks and 7-8 boards per contest over a 3 year span. He can also stretch your defense. The only other players I've seen with that combination of shotblocking and 3 point marksmenship were Jonathan Bender and Eddie Griffin.
    There you go that deal makes sense if we throw in a couple of picks maybe 2 first rounders and 2 second rounders.

  5. #80
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Those kinds of trades for Pierce have been turned down before. It's not cut and dry -- how many Scola/Javtokas/Mahnimi jersey sales are you projecting?

    Don't answer a question with a question...

    Where would Javtokas, Scola and Mahnimi go in this years draft? Just in your opinion? It's already common thought that Scola would go high in this draft...has Mahnimi's stock gone down? What about Javtokas?

  6. #81
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Dude you're not making any sense you just said before he was "a ing stud". Yes he is a franchise player did you see the way he played the second half of last year?

    February:33.5 ppg 48.1% fg

    March:27.6 ppg 46% fg

    His numbers for the year: 26.8 ppg 47.1% fg 5.7 rpg 4.7 apg.

    I suppose Barkley and KG aren't franchise players because they had some bad teams in their primes?

    I know what his numbers are...but he's still not a franchise player...he never was in the true sense.

  7. #82
    Get It Sparked Up SPARKY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    5,172
    , I'd even take Veal from them if they cough Pierce.

    Manu
    Horry
    Barry
    Williams
    Oberto

    Pierce
    "Veal" LaFrentz

    Boston would ing love Manu for those 70 games he plays per year, and the rest would be gone soon.

    Veal was a good shotblocker and rebounder until Nellie got ahold of him, averaging close to 3 blocks and 7-8 boards per contest over a 3 year span. He can also stretch your defense. The only other players I've seen with that combination of shotblocking and 3 point marksmenship were Jonathan Bender and Eddie Griffin.
    Pierce + Veal carries a fairly substantial price tag. $26 mil next season.

  8. #83
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Oh, Sczerbiak? Yuck, they can keep Pierce if he's the price of admission.

  9. #84
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    Would Scola go high at his age?

    This is a ty, ty draft. So three mid-to-late first rounders in a ty, ty draft who haven't played a second in the NBA are lower are worth Pierce?

    I'm sure Zeke could put together a better deal.

    I think alot if it depends on Ainge's ego with this particular draft. If he thinks he can get what he thinks is a missing piece at #5, expect no Pierce trade.

  10. #85
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    There you go that deal makes sense if we throw in a couple of picks maybe 2 first rounders and 2 second rounders.


    That deal doesn't make sense because LaFrentz and Pierce make a combined 25 million...we don't have that much salary to give up unless we are talking 2 of our big 3.

  11. #86
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    Oh, Sczerbiak? Yuck, they can keep Pierce if he's the price of admission.
    Strike two.

    C'mon guys....

  12. #87
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Would Scola go high at his age?

    This is a ty, ty draft. So three mid-to-late first rounders in a ty, ty draft who haven't played a second in the NBA are lower are worth Pierce?
    Since Pierce can't get them to the playoffs..yeah.



    I'm sure Zeke could put together a better deal.
    Like what?



    I think alot if it depends on Ainge's ego with this particular draft. If he thinks he can get what he thinks is a missing piece at #5, expect no Pierce trade.
    IF it's true about Pierce being put on the block, there's more at issue here than a missing piece.

    We already know Ainge wants to bring his own guys in...ask Toine.

  13. #88
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    The Knicks idea has more merit than anything else suggested in opposition to what the Spurs could offer...

    The Knicks could get half the NBA under the cap if they wanted too...

    There's just one thing...the Knicks and Celtics hate each other, ins utionally, are both run by 2 GM's with at ude, and are probably the last two teams that would do a trade together.


    No way does Ainge want Paul Pierce getting stuck up his ass 4 times a year...

  14. #89
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    Since Pierce can't get them to the playoffs..yeah.
    Who blames Pierce for that? Boston fans?
    Like what?
    Like players who actually played in the NBA.
    IF it's true about Pierce being put on the block, there's more at issue here than a missing piece.
    IF Pierce has been on the block before and not been traded, there's more at issue here than wanting four guys who haven't played in the league before. Again, we're talking about Ainge's perception -- and the owners' -- not ours.

  15. #90
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    The Knicks idea has more merit than anything else suggested in opposition to what the Spurs could offer...

    The Knicks could get half the NBA under the cap if they wanted too...

    There's just one thing...the Knicks and Celtics hate each other, ins utionally, are both run by 2 GM's with at ude, and are probably the last two teams that would do a trade together.


    No way does Ainge want Paul Pierce getting stuck up his ass 4 times a year...
    Well, that depends on which guy thinks he is screwing the other worse. Oh to be a fly on the wall for those negotiations....

  16. #91
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Sorry Dump...you usually make a good Devil's advocate but you just aren't getting the job done.

    Look obviously...If Pierce is on the block, it's not because they are expecting to get better Superstar in return...because it's not going to happen. And I doubt a #5 pick is going to fix it either. Ainge wants his guys...and it's a rebuild even if not a salary dump rebuld.


    Too me it's obvious that if they are even talking about this then they intend to tank the season...and don't say Boston is above doing this...

    The Spurs do have talent, and it's talent that doesn't have to be signed right away neccessarily. It's cheap talent, and it's all IMO, first round talent.

    I mean I like our overseas talent and most of the scouts do too.

    I don't see him getting very many good offers for Pierce...because Pierce isn't going to change the fortunes of a bad team, he's not young, and he's expensive...



    Only a good one...how many good teams can offer more than the Spurs, that won't up a good tank job?

  17. #92
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    Look obviously...If Pierce is on the block, it's not because they are expecting to get better Superstar in return...because it's not going to happen.
    They've aparently turned down better trades than you've put forth, that's all.
    Too me it's obvious that if they are even talking about this then they intend to tank the season...
    But, they've been talking about trading him for years now. Regardless of how badly the team does, Pierce is still their main draw and nobody we would offer is going to become the cash cow he is.
    I don't see him getting very many good offers for Pierce...because Pierce isn't going to change the fortunes of a bad team...only a good one...how many good teams can offer more than the Spurs, that won't up a good tank job?
    I don't think any GM could justify killing the golden goose after committing to Wally for three more seasons.

  18. #93
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    They've aparently turned down better trades than you've put forth, that's all.
    Like who? Like what?

    But, they've been talking about trading him for years now.
    And how mahy of those other years were as ty as this one?

    Regardless of how badly the team does, Pierce is still their main draw and nobody we would offer is going to become the cash cow he is.
    Oh please...it's ing Boston. Draw, cash cow....it's Boston.

    Yeah...maybe they'll have to move the team if they lose. Gimme a ing break.



    I don't think any GM could justify killing the golden goose after committing to Wally for three more seasons.
    Golden Gooses don't finish in the lottery.

  19. #94
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Here's a deal that makes a lot of sense....

    Stackhouse - $8,000,000
    Bradley - $4,800,000
    Abdul-Wahad - $1,968,750
    Eschemeyer - $3,711,400
    Podkolzine - $1,221,240
    Diop - $2,160,000
    Rawle Marshall - $664,209

    TOTAL: $22.5256 million

    - for -

    Paul Pierce - $15,101,626
    Wally Szczerzbiak - $11,000,000

    TOTAL - $26.1016 million

    85 % of $26.1016 million is $22.18 million, meaning Dallas' deal works under the cap.

    PG Terry
    SG Pierce
    SF Howard
    PF Nowitzki
    C Dampier
    6 Harris
    7 Daniels
    8 Szczerzbiak
    9 Griffin
    10 MLE
    11 MBenga


    That's a really scary thought... everyone Dallas moves comes off the books in 2007 except for Diop and Bradley, who combine for about $7 million in 2007 and come off in 2008.

    In this scenario Boston is looking at having about $27-$28 million committed in 2007. If they're looking to dump Pierce for nothing this trade makes so much sense, seeing they get to dump Szcerzbiak and get a quickly improving bigman in Diop too. I think this hugely trumps what the Spurs can give.

  20. #95
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    What makes everyone think Ainge wants to dump Wally?


    It's Boston....

  21. #96
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,433
    In that vein, it's obvious Ainge is just waiting out the BYC period to trade Pierce and Jefferson for Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy. In the meantime they can swap picks so Ainge will eventually end up with:

    au
    Red
    Szczerbiak
    Murphy
    LaFrentz

    And MickeyD off the bench.

  22. #97
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Just sayin'...he just traded for Wally. I assume there was a reason for it.


    I could see him being ready to dump LaFrentz...but I have a hunch he's planning on keeping Wally.

  23. #98
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Here's a deal that makes a lot of sense....

    Stackhouse - $8,000,000
    Bradley - $4,800,000
    Abdul-Wahad - $1,968,750
    Eschemeyer - $3,711,400
    Podkolzine - $1,221,240
    Diop - $2,160,000
    Rawle Marshall - $664,209

    TOTAL: $22.5256 million

    - for -

    Paul Pierce - $15,101,626
    Wally Szczerzbiak - $11,000,000

    TOTAL - $26.1016 million

    85 % of $26.1016 million is $22.18 million, meaning Dallas' deal works under the cap.

    PG Terry
    SG Pierce
    SF Howard
    PF Nowitzki
    C Dampier
    6 Harris
    7 Daniels
    8 Szczerzbiak
    9 Griffin
    10 MLE
    11 MBenga


    That's a really scary thought... everyone Dallas moves comes off the books in 2007 except for Diop and Bradley, who combine for about $7 million in 2007 and come off in 2008.

    In this scenario Boston is looking at having about $27-$28 million committed in 2007. If they're looking to dump Pierce for nothing this trade makes so much sense, seeing they get to dump Szcerzbiak and get a quickly improving bigman in Diop too. I think this hugely trumps what the Spurs can give.
    It trumps it in terms of cap relief but not necessarily in terms of talent...I mean that talent trade off sucks. Diop aint all that.....

    For cap purposes it does work...and Boston might also set a record for number of C's on a roster in a season.

    It's a good deal, and probably the best one I have seen suggested...but no one wants to give any credit at all for the talent the Spurs have sitting overseas...No one is saying these guys are scrubs you know.

    The one piece they get a C is probably not their greatest need even in terms of rebuild...and Perkins is impropving.

    Edit: I just looked, I'd take Perkins over Diop period right now.

  24. #99
    Oak Cliff hard hitta
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,055
    Here's a deal that makes a lot of sense....

    Stackhouse - $8,000,000
    Bradley - $4,800,000
    Abdul-Wahad - $1,968,750
    Eschemeyer - $3,711,400
    Podkolzine - $1,221,240
    Diop - $2,160,000
    Rawle Marshall - $664,209

    TOTAL: $22.5256 million

    - for -

    Paul Pierce - $15,101,626
    Wally Szczerzbiak - $11,000,000

    TOTAL - $26.1016 million

    85 % of $26.1016 million is $22.18 million, meaning Dallas' deal works under the cap.

    PG Terry
    SG Pierce
    SF Howard
    PF Nowitzki
    C Dampier
    6 Harris
    7 Daniels
    8 Szczerzbiak
    9 Griffin
    10 MLE
    11 MBenga


    That's a really scary thought... everyone Dallas moves comes off the books in 2007 except for Diop and Bradley, who combine for about $7 million in 2007 and come off in 2008.

    In this scenario Boston is looking at having about $27-$28 million committed in 2007. If they're looking to dump Pierce for nothing this trade makes so much sense, seeing they get to dump Szcerzbiak and get a quickly improving bigman in Diop too. I think this hugely trumps what the Spurs can give.

    Lol I wish this would happen, there have already been paul pierce to dallas rumors.

  25. #100
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    It trumps it in terms of cap relief but not necessarily in terms of talent...I mean that talent trade off sucks. Diop aint all that.....

    For cap purposes it does work...and Boston might also set a record for number of C's on a roster in a season.

    It's a good deal, and probably the best one I have seen suggested...but no one wants to give any credit at all for the talent the Spurs have sitting overseas...No one is saying these guys are scrubs you know.

    The one piece they get a C is probably not their greatest need even in terms of rebuild...and Perkins is impropving.

    Edit: I just looked, I'd take Perkins over Diop period right now.
    They gotta have it one way or the other... cap relief or talent in return. I can't see Pierce going without someone taking Wally or Raef. Besides, they could tank for Oden with this trade.

    The trade also works if you swap Wally-World and LaFrentz.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •