Reply With Quote
terrorists are like roaches... they will always be around, but that doesn't mean you don't kill one if you see it.
How is from what country their were originally from relevant, Einstein?
They were AQ and AQ was hidding in Afghanistan, not Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the US invaded Afghanistan.
I'm confused. Aren't you the one who claims the US should go after Osama?
In any case, the US got lazy because they should be looking in the mountains of Pakistan, still hunting for OBL, not monkeying around in Iraq.
Don't worry about me. In any case, you did not make me think that hard.
But as I said before, the US-Afghanistan/Iraq analogy is a poor one. Those are more convensional wars, what Israel has to go throuigh is not a convensional war.
terrorists are like roaches... they will always be around, but that doesn't mean you don't kill one if you see it.
Other than those "appropiate posters Manny has credibility with" that he recently spoke of, I think most posters interpret his churlish remark as reflecting on him and not his intended target.
These people remind me of those rubber-neckers on freeway that just have to stop and see what is going on at every little accident and then they cause even more when they create traffic flow problems.
I thought we bombed afghanastan back up to the stone age....
manny is always right...
i am suprised he doesn't have the kids in front of him for protection.. that is probably the next picture that we are not seeing
Call me crazy but despite his insults, I'm actually fond of Manny
Last edited by smeagol; 09-10-2006 at 10:06 AM.
Terrorists methods are never justified. I would like to see what you think if California ever wants to be independant from the rest of the US using terrorist methods. That's what ETA does with regards to the Basque territories. What I'm trying to say is that it not only about control the way you have implied it.
What's your solution? Mine is to seperate Israelis and Palestinians, given that they cannot get along. Separate them all together.
Tell this to Bush.
There's more where they came from, Einstein. And they are getting money from those countries as well, Einstein.And where are they now?They were AQ and AQ was hidding in Afghanistan, not Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the US invaded Afghanistan.And where is he now? Iraq?I'm confused. Aren't you the one who claims the US should go after Osama?Thanks for pretending my point is yours.In any case, the US got lazy because they should be looking in the mountains of Pakistan, still hunting for OBL, not monkeying around in Iraq.Since you didn't know you agreed with me, you definitely didn't think that much.Don't worry about me. In any case, you did not make me think that hard.
Well gee, Manny, how freakin' easy do the Palestinians and Hezbollah make it for Israel to avoid collateral damage?
Seriously, they hold planning session, build their bombs, have their meetings, cache their weapons, and execute their attacks from among innocent Palestinian and Lebanese civilian populations.
If they'd establish typical military installations and conduct their military activities in a more conventional manner, their enemies wouldn't be forced into such tough decisions. Maybe it only looks like the IDF is less considerate of these facts because they've been fighting these types of pathetic imbeciles for a lot longer than most other countries.
Exactly which sovereign Hezbollah land is Israel occupying?
Isreal occupies Lebanese soil know was Shebaa Farms in the Golan.
Where should Israelis live then?
AQ was organized in Afghanistan and that's were the US (rightly) went to fight the war against terrorism.
The fact that the 9/11 terorists were from Saudi Arabia is irrelevant (which is one of the points you made, which makes little sense). They were trained by AQ who, to the best of our knowledge, was and is located in Afghanistan.
With your same logic, given that that Reid fellow was a British citizen, the US should bomb the out of England.
I don't know what your point is. It seems to be that because the 9/11 terrorists were from SA, we should attack that country. Obviously a stupid idea and certainly not what I said.
I probably agree with you that the war with Iraq was innecesary. There are many other things I do not agree with you.
No argument there.AQ was organized in Afghanistan and that's were the US (rightly) went to fight the war against terrorism.Hardly.The fact that the 9/11 terorists were from Saudi Arabia is irrelevantThink harder.I don't know what your point is.Amen.I probably agree with you that the war with Iraq was innecesary. There are many other things I do not agree with you.
Isreal. The settlements are entirely illegal although I'm not even sure there are any in that part of the Golan.
Well manny, when Palestinians, or any other arab group break a peace pact by escalating Israeli deaths, then the land that was given for peace is up for the taking, since the aggressors did not live up to their end of the deal.
I mean that's how pacts/treaties/contracts go. Both parties have to live up to their word. So in that essence, Israel is doing nothing illegal.
Explain to me what your point is Chump (in more than one line, please) because I have thought hard and I don't see it.
You are against the war in Iraq but you sponsor a war against Saudi Arabia because that's where most of the 9/11 terrorists come from?
By the way, OBL is also from SA (another reason to attack that kingdom, tright?)
Weren't Israel moving out of those "illegal" settlements some months ago and bulldozing them down?
Funny that you would use a religious word to note our differences, given that politically we probably agree in many respects.
Gasp! Oh no, how can those poor Lebanese people live with Israel occupying nearly 10 square miles of mostly worthless land? That just happens to offer the perfect position for launching rockets and s ing Israeli villages. Land that belonged to Syria, not Lebanon, until someone figured it could score a few more anti-Israel points if they said it was stolen Lebanese land.
Well, I hope the tactical advantadge gained by the land is worth the strategic, diplomatic, and political disadvantadges it places it at. And Syria has said long ago the land belonged to Lebanon.
Oh, and when people are willing to fight over it so much and die for it, I really doubt you can term it worthless.
Sure, in Gaza. Too bad they continuing building them in the West Bank.
Well, alot of the stuff discussed in here is axiomatic anyway, and no one seems like he would actually change any of the beliefs they bring to the table in the first place. I'd be a little worried if I agreed with everything any one poster had to say. The best I or anyone else could do is try to be more respectful. Fat chance, I know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
