Reply With Quote
Hm, so the definition of an imbecile is someone who doesn`t see into the future???
Learn to read better before you post could also be said. This is an old topic.
It's much harder for guards to dominate the NBA with the zone rules. These days you need a quality big man to make a championship run(Shaq and TD winning 8 of the last 9 'ships)
Hm, so the definition of an imbecile is someone who doesn`t see into the future???
Learn to read better before you post could also be said. This is an old topic.
he is?
I just choked on my coffee on that one
I don't think that's right. Zone rules tend to help small teams beat teams with a dominant big man. Shaq and TD would be even more effective without zone (at least on Offense).
All of the new rules help guards score and penetrate, and hurt big men.
Why are we comparing Tony Parker to Tim Duncan?
Tony Parker > The Kidd
That's all that matters.
look at when i posted it before you ing post, face. you seem like even more of an imbecile.
thank you. at least someone was paying attention.Hm, so the definition of an imbecile is someone who doesn`t see into the future???
Learn to read better before you post could also be said. This is an old topic.
its also funny just how obsessed spursreport is with me. i swear, more than 90% of his posts somehow involve me.
where did i say ALL SEASON LONG that i would trust both of them more than Parker? I'm sure I said that I would trust terry more, and based on his history at the time of my posts, many people would agree. i dont recall constantly saying that I trust devin harris more in the clutch, although again, at the time of my posts, i would have, because he actually plays defense, unlike your boy Parker.
it's pretty pathetic to bump a 6 month old thread. spursreport is a .
yeah they said o, 10 years ago, the last time a team won a championship without a center.
karma is a .
Parker's defense has dramatically improved. He has evolved into an all around complete player. It sucks that karma is a doesn't it?
and you're still a .
it's certainly better than fishing through 6 month old threads to try to "stick it" to some guy on the internet that you're obsessed with.
It is fun quoting people who are wrong. Plus I am not the only one who does it. You can have stretch dont worry. I dont roll like that. I see how you are getting all protective over him.
yes this front page is littered with 6 month old threads bumped by s with nothing better to do than go after somebody on the internet who they're obsessed with.
Yes. And that would simplify matters.
if you think parker is the best player in the spurs roster you are smoking weed.
Normally, it does.
Unfortunately, Parker's defense has not dramatically improved as you say it has. Please do us all a favor and help yourself to a cup of "shut the up."
You are the one obsessed with a man on a sports forum.
Or he never see to Spurs vs Mavs games
I'd say anyone that's able to handle AI and Steve Nash is a capable defender.
I didn't mean improve to where it is first team all defense but it sure as has gotten so much better.Oh and another thing Parker can handle physical play. Soft players don't win the finals MVP. Plus you should be the last person calling players soft when your team is full of them including Irk Noheartski. Here is to Tony Parker proving you wrong!
Haha.. what an idiot.. I seldom come into this forum because I have been traveling. You can't comment anything on Parker because you just haven't watched enough of him played in recent games. Just laid off the hate and go back to your face Mavs forum and trump on DirkNoWINski ..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions