Tony Parker is playing much, much better this year than Terry. Last year he led the NBA in points in the paint for much of the year... a point guard! How can you possibly say they're =?
Parker is averaging more points (19.6 vs. 16.3), MORE assists (6.1 vs. 4.8, despite the notion that Parker is not a passer), and more rebounds than Terry (3.2 vs. 2.7). That's right. Tony Parker is averaging more points, boards, and assists than Terry. But he plays more, right? Wrong. Parker is averaging 33 mpg, while Terry averages 34.8. Should I mention that Parker is shooting 53% while Terry is at 45.6%? Or that Parker is getting to the line far more frequently WHILE getting more assists? On a team that usually gets the point a low # of assists because we're notorious for making 3-4 passes per possession?
Sorry, but when I saw your post I immediately signed up for the boards. Making vast general statements like Terry = Parker discounts not only Parker's incredible improvement as a point guard overall, but the complete differences in the game they play. Parker can collapse a defense at will, and with a paint presence like Duncan that is irreplacable, not to mention the 3 point shooting the Spurs have this year.
Also, Dirk and Duncan do NOT cancel out. Tim Duncan is perhaps the best crunch-time defender in the NBA. Make no mistake, he WILL show up in the playoffs. Dirk is slightly superior on offense during the regular season, but when Duncan sets his mind to it, he is unguardable. Period (since apparently we're into typing out punctuation on these boards). I wouldn't ever trade Timmy for Dirk. The defense is just too valuable to give up. Watch down the stretch of the season, when games really make a difference. Duncan will be swatting balls all over the court to get the Spurs a #1 seed.
Howard is a great player. Yet the Mavs have two great players. Dirk and Howard. The Spurs have three. Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili. I'll take that against the Mavs starters anyday, especially if Bowen and Barry are knocking down shots.
How can it possibly be said that the Mavs are "clearly" the better team when we're not even halfway into the season and a sole game is the difference between the two? The Spurs are averaging an almost double-digit point difference, while the Mavs are around 6.5. That to me is an equally valid comparison as a record that is so similiar.
If the Spurs stay healthy and the 3 point shooting answers the call this post-season, I don't fear the Mavs. I'm eagerly awaiting the matchup, because I know it will be a great one.