not touchy at all, my friend....that is why there was the smiley face..but the fact that you brought that up makes me think you are being touchy when in reality you know I was messing with you.

(see there it is again)
But just because you say Young is not deserving of the attention does not make it fact, just like if I say he does, doesn't make it fact.
To answer your question, no. Just because someone thinks someone doesn't agree with an award winner automatically makes that person a hater, just like if someone agrees with the award winner doesn't mean they are a homer.
Pistons<Spurs is of the opinion that Young had little to do with his teams success, I am of the opinion that he did. Who is right? Neither. Who is wrong? Neither. Both of those statements are opinions and therefore by definition cannot be right or wrong.
My point is this. There are people on this board and fans off this board who are incapable of being objective. You know this to be true because you have seen it against your USC guys. Vince Young could throw for 4000 yards, run for 1000 more, throw 50 td's to 1 INT and some will still say he sucks
for the sole reason that he went to UT. Matt Leinart could do the same and some would find a reason to denigrate him
for the sole reason that he is a Trojan. You had talked about how its stupid to talk smack about a good team who lost a tight game to another good team....how smart is it to base smack on a pro player based on what his college was?
I disagree with you that Young played poorly most of the season. Doesn't mean you are stupid or wrong...doesn't mean I am either...its just a difference. To me, he did plenty of things to help his team win and, to me, winning is all that matters. Someone may disagree but that is cool...that is what makes all this fun.
