Reply With Quote
Bump
You're exactly right about that. All these wins will mean jackcrap without the ring at the end.Your right! Record season records don't do justice. I know the spurs don't have more les than the bulls, lakers, and celts but they do have at least ONE! Not at best but at least one. At best, The mavs have 0 and spurs least is better than mavs best. So with that said, the mavs can go 73-9 this year and if they don't win it all, it will be a disgrace to their franchise and a HUGE disappointment to their fans. That is all.
Bump
Oh believe me this season will be worth it. Just watch.
I think the rule should be, If your team hasn't won a championship since the creation of another team, you are not allowed to talk about them never having a championship. I.E. the Knicks
No. The Knicks haven't won a championship since 1973, 34 years ago. That is well before the mavericks were even being thought of as an organization. Chris is talking about the mavs not winning in 26 years, when it has been 34 since the Knicks last won.
How many times have the mavs gone to the finals? 1
Now how many times have the knicks gone to the finals?8
Now how many times have the mavs won a le?0
Now how many time have the knicks won a le? 2 which is 2>0 More than your team, so therefore.................
Oh by the way......
2/8>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>0/1
It took the Knicks 24 years to win a le.
I'm just saying.
^^^^^^^^
More OWNAGE!!
THis time by a spurs fan! HEHEHEHEHEHHE
"Hahahahahahaha" laughed the fan of the has been team.
No, he just owned you dumbass.^^^^^^^^
More OWNAGE!!
THis time by a spurs fan! HEHEHEHEHEHHE
and saying 2/8 is like a cowboys fan talking to a seahawks fan using the 5 super bowls from last century.
There is no logic to any of the arguments in this thread, because the greatness of a franchise shouldn't be (and usually isn't) measured by how long it took the franchise to win its first le, if it has won a le at all.
For instance, the Warriors won the first BAA/NBA le -- meaning they won a le in the first year of their existence. Applying the "logic" that has been thrown around in this thread, the Warriors own all.
By contrast, it took the Bulls 25 years to win a le and it took the Pistons 41 years to win a le.
I guess Warriors > Lakers (took them 2 years to win a le); Warriors > Celtics (11 years); Warriors > Bulls; Warriors > Spurs; and Warriors > Pistons. And Warriors definitely > Knicks. Right?
The same must be true of the Kings (won a le in their 3rd year), the Bucks (won a le in their 3rd year), the Sixers (won a le in their 6th year), the Blazers (won a le in their 7th year), the Hawks (won a le in their 9th year), and the Sonics (won a le in their 12th year).
i don't know what it is, but the mavs still don't have a le...
How did he own me? He said It took the knicks 24 years to win a le. GET IT?No, he just owned you dumbass.
and saying 2/8 is like a cowboys fan talking to a seahawks fan using the 5 super bowls from last century.
It took them 24 years to WIN a LE. When was the last time the mavs done that? Oh yeah...... NEVER.
And it's not like a cowboys fan talking .......
The fact of the matter is that in the 26 years of the Dallas mavs existence, they have yet to win a le and probably never will.
I just believe fans of the team that don't have no success in the post-season like have no Larry O' in their Trophy case , then they can't talk . Stop saying this and that about the mavs when your team has 'no right' to talk about anyone, anything, or any group given their history. I know alot of mavs fans talk alot of crap on here and I get sick of it. They act all y just because their team is tops and is almost unstoppable right now just like the pistons last year and we seen what happened to them. Even though the spurs wasn't apart of the finals last season or might not be apart of it this season, the spurs fans have 'the right' to talk about anyone, anything, or any group given their teams' history(Trophy Case). They know how it feel to win it all, your team doesn't!
Now continue to watch the spurs and rockets go all the way as your team will NEVER win the big one. MUAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
The Pistons/Mavs comparison kills me every time.
Nice. A little research goes a lawng ways.
If I were a mod I would ban anybody who was completely incapable of discussing anything other than sheer number of les. Seriously, if you see everything in basketball in terms of black-and-white "does your franchise history have a le", then you're re ed.
The 2007 Larry O'Brien trophy is still up for grabs, so anybody has "the right" to talk about it. Man, I can't believe how obvious this is, yet some dense Knicks fans still can't comprehend it.
I know, it tooks the Knicks 24 years to win a le. It has only been 26 for the mavs and you are acting like that is the longest a team has ever gone without winning in their existance. When really the mavs are only 2 short years past what it took the knicks to win.
IF you win the le this year.
Suns are on year 39 with none.
Uh, I believe this thread was started by a Knicks fan eh?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
