Shiites Call for U.S. to Leave Iraq

[smeagol]

you do realize there are ppl living in complete in Latin America right? and that has been happening for centuries.

Of course I do, I come from there, remember? And now I live in LatAm again (after a while living in the US).

i beleive violence is not the answer(it was his answer)

So how can you sympathize with the dude? All he predicated was violence. He, and his ilk, are the reason we have had so much violence in the 60s and 70s in LatAm.

but something has to be done about that.

Huh? So you don't agree witrh violence but you end up saying this , which practicly justifies the violence.

You are like whottt, but from the left, who claims the US never used the Saddam-AQ link to go to war, even after the VP continues to support that link.

[whottt]

Dude, the difference between you and me is that I do get embarassed by some of the my countrymen (and especially the Argentine politicians) do.

Yeah, I've never ripped any of my countymen or it's politicians...

No, smeagol, that sort of take is why I insulted you.

Are you honestly trying to say I never rip my country or it's politicians?

You deserve to be insulted for that take...it's a stupid ing take.

just like, you deserve to be insulted for not knowing the difference between having WMD, and seeking to accquire them, and why that would make a difference in a war strategy....when it is clearly in front of you.

Either you are genuinely stupid, which I doubt, and if you are re ed I apologize for my abusive demeanor...or you are simply choosing to be closeminded...in which case you deserve my derision...






All I do on here is rip my countrymen and politicians...

boutons and nbadan are my countrymen...yannnow?


John Kerry is a politician, yannow?

You, OTOH, naivly believe whatever the US does is fine.

False...



I didn';t think it was fine we pulled out of Vietnam and left millions of Vietnames to die and be enslaved and have their property stolen from them..I consider that a point of shame for this country.



I didn't think it was fine we didn't take Saddam out the first time we had the opportunity. After encouraging the uprising...in fact, I think that might have been the biggest asshole act in the history of my country...

But I just want to make sure that you realize that it wasn't only my country that did that...and pretty sure Daddy Bush being the war monger that he is, would have liked nothing better.







But wha tI do think? Is my country is less ed up than yours, it's less ed up than France, it's less ed up than any country in the middle east....it's less ed up than China. It's less ed up than 90% of the countries in Europe...


IF your country is doing better...by all means rip. If it's not...I sincerely believe you'd be better served by figuring out your own countries numerous problems...rather than trying to fix mine, or blaming mine for your countries problems. I say this not to you...but international posters in general.


I wish I had a dollar for every dumbass Euro that's run slavery smack on me for being American...all the while being so incredibly ing stupid as not realize that it was custom imported directly from Europe, and ins utionalized in this country when it was a European Colony....not the USA.





Hey Smeagol...how many blacks hold polical office in Argentina?

How many Africans in France?


How many whites in South Korea?


How many whites and Christians in the Middle East?


And we're the racists?



What was Argentina's reason for invading the Falkands? To install Democracy?


GFY.

[boutons_]

In their campaign of lies, misrepresentation, disinformation, and cherry picking, WHIG made it very clear that:

Saddam = Terror

al Quaida = Terror

al Quaida = Terror = WTC

ergo, the very blatant association in the sheeple/rabble dumb s:

Saddam = WTC

So a majority of US and the US military believed, in 2003/04, that the invasion of Iraq/Saddam equalled payback for the WTC/al-Quaida/terror. The majority now know, as dubya has admitted, while head kept saying the opposite, that there was no Saddam-WTC or Saddam-al Quaida link.

here's an article that synopsizes well, with quotes,
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00247.htm

Note the pre-2000 work, campaign, publications of the neo- s at AEI/PNAC and elsewhere to build a false case for invading Iraq as smokescreen for grabbing Iraqi oil.

[xrayzebra]

In their campaign of lies, misrepresentation, disinformation, and cherry picking, WHIG made it very clear that:

Saddam = Terror

al Quaida = Terror

al Quaida = Terror = WTC

ergo, the very blatant association in the sheeple/rabble dumb s:

Saddam = WTC

So a majority of US and the US military believed, in 2003/04, that the invasion of Iraq/Saddam equalled payback for the WTC/al-Quaida/terror. The majority now know, as dubya has admitted, while head kept saying the opposite, that there was no Saddam-WTC or Saddam-al Quaida link.

here's an article that synopsizes well, with quotes,
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00247.htm

Note the pre-2000 work, campaign, publications of the neo- s at AEI/PNAC and elsewhere to build a false case for invading Iraq as smokescreen for grabbing Iraqi oil.

Good old boutons, preaching a little more hate today.
Typical liberal.

[George Gervin's Afro]

In their campaign of lies, misrepresentation, disinformation, and cherry picking, WHIG made it very clear that:

Saddam = Terror

al Quaida = Terror

al Quaida = Terror = WTC

ergo, the very blatant association in the sheeple/rabble dumb s:

Saddam = WTC

So a majority of US and the US military believed, in 2003/04, that the invasion of Iraq/Saddam equalled payback for the WTC/al-Quaida/terror. The majority now know, as dubya has admitted, while head kept saying the opposite, that there was no Saddam-WTC or Saddam-al Quaida link.

here's an article that synopsizes well, with quotes,
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00247.htm

Note the pre-2000 work, campaign, publications of the neo- s at AEI/PNAC and elsewhere to build a false case for invading Iraq as smokescreen for grabbing Iraqi oil.

Boutons..you will never get the Fox News 'Fair and Balanced' crowd to acknowledge if you repeat something enough people will start to believe it as fact..ie. 'saddam and 9/1'1 in almost every speech in the run up to the unecessary war..

[whottt]

Still waiting for that link where Bush said Saddam was behind 911 when we went into Iraq...

Any century now...

[George Gervin's Afro]

Still waiting for that link where Bush said Saddam was behind 911 when we went into Iraq...

Any century now...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0918-03.htm

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0916-02.htm


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...oll-iraq_x.htm


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10164478/


Ok whott you can play stupid. Bush and Cheney continually linked both saddam and 9/11 in very speech leading up to the uncessary war. Why do you suppose a majority of Americans at one time believe that Saddam had something to with 9/11? Please explain that? How could the public link Saddam and 9/11 ?????