What I've always found interesting about Bowen is the fact that the league has taken formal disciplinary action against him exactly 2 times since he's been with the Spurs: (1) a relatively small fine for the Szczerbiak incident in 2002; and (2) a $10,000 fine for his kick to Ray Allen's back in 2005. That's it. For a guy alleged to be out to injure players -- and generally, star players, since Bowen tends to draw defensive assignments on the league's elite -- the league sure doesn't have much to say about what he does. Either the league doesn't care that Bowen is acting "recklessly" around its biggest draws or the league has looked and decided that the complaints about Bowen are mostly a bunch of whining and, in any event, not worthy of disciplinary action.
I'd be interested for someone to compare Bowen's disciplinary history with the league against Raja Bell's -- you can even use Bruce's entire tenure with the Spurs against Bell's tenure just with the Suns. I have the feeling that one might not come out so well for Raja in comparison.
But Bowen is undoubtedly the far dirtier player; Bell is just wrongly persecuted and misunderstood. If only he played for the Spurs, he'd get away with all of his foolishness.
