creative enough to get another reply out of you.
maybe don't make it so obvious that you're not happy with what i'm saying.
Evidently so. You mentioned that it might be, not me.
creative enough to get another reply out of you.
maybe don't make it so obvious that you're not happy with what i'm saying.
Ok, since this little e-argument has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I" courtesy of our resident mental paragon, monosylab1k, I'll bow out.
Seriously, get your game up son. A little smack between members can be a great read for the others and you ruined it with what could only be considered "weaksauce".
You are new at this.
I guess you're a veteran of the art of Internet Bad Ass? Good job.
no, "weaksauce" would be realizing that your "reading comprehension" smack got shoved right back in your face, but backtracking by saying "i never said you did, i was just presupposing that you might". that's good stuff right there.
as soon as your knuckes don't drag on the floor as you walk, get back to me. seeing that you're a tool fan, i doubt i'll hear from you again.
peace.
To continue my point... so is suggesting yourself to be above an argument in which you are an active participant.
Corso, i like your pencil.
the language that you have employed in this argument is further proof (as if that were needed) of how poorly you do in talking exchanges between the two of us.
distinctive words like "masturbatory" and " y" have been directly copied from what I wrote making fun of you, mr. 6,000 posts in 6 months. You even used to respond to my posts by whining about me using words like " y" and " gy"
if you can't beat 'em join 'em, eh?
any chance you will acknowledge your respect for me and my rhetoric that you have coopted, or you will write this off to coincedence?
by the way, disregard this mono guy's take on music. he is a high-school aged emo . his idea of a relevent album in the year 2007 is "zeitguist" by the Smashing Pumpkins (no, I am not making this up)
"distinctive"
actually, yes you are.
so thats what youve got, then? a gy picture of a cartoon laughing?
i'll admit my exchanges with you are far more interesting than that of Suns fans or Tool fans. how's that?
i'm not making this up, pussyface thinks the guy who invented "thumbs up, thumbs down" is the most intellectual movie critic of all time.
i thought that because you blogged about it extensively you liked it.
my mistake.
i didn't consider that when you have no life to the extent that you rack up 6,000 posts in 6 months you blog extensively about alot of bull you aren't really that into.
pulitzer prize winner roger ebert?
good one, pal
i didn't consider that when you have no life you obsessively track the posting history of others.
dude, you post in a lot of threads. a big percentage.
you pop up in a lot of the ones I read and frequently say a lot of questionable things, ya know?
...another nice try though
you'd figure someone that awesome wouldn't bother getting into a spat with the likes of vincent gallo. but hey, anything for publicity.
Okay...now I've got to check this Mars Volta band out.
i have been a spurstalker for longer than you have, and have racked up 1/6th of as many posts (???)
yeah but even I didn't know about 6000 in 6 months. i appreciate you keeping track of that. your obsession with me is almost flattering if not for the inherent creep factor.
congratulations.
the guy likes alot of ty movies, these days especially. but his reviews are always worth reading and far less hacky than anyone else I know of
i was only estimating. i thought i was overshooting. im not dr phil with a degree from north texas, but its safe to say that 1,000 posts per month (and not getting paid for it) can't be a sign of a healthy individual.
if it weren't so insanely dorky, it would be an amazing and admirable accomplishment, like climbing mt. everest or something.
is this really an argument you can win (has that ever stopped you before?)
i'm guessing some simple math (10 posts a day, 30 days in a month) will tell you how far off you are, but that's probably a bit much to ask.
is there really any way you can deny that you are absolutely obsessed with me? look at your own post history and i'd estimate that over 50% of your posts are in direct reply to something i write.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)