View Poll Results: David or Tim?

Voters
208. You may not vote on this poll
  • Robinson

    103 49.52%
  • Duncan

    105 50.48%
Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 217
  1. #76
    Veteran dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    20,159
    Damn...I'm sorry, but it's actually painful to make myself that stupid...I'll leave it to you.
    You made yourself far stupider about 20 posts ago, take an Advil and go to bed before you need a doctor.

  2. #77
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Now you are just being ridiculous, you are on one side then the other. First Duncan wants it more than anyone and now you act like "Nah maybe not" i'm done with this one, on to the Dallas game and that actually matters going forward.

    Later.

    You miss the point entirely...I'm not saying Duncan didn't want it more than DRob...


    I'm saying that doesn't mean he'd beat him in a game of one on one. As you are trying to argue that it does...



    Oh and I'm also saying that anyone that thinks David Robinson was some kind of liabilty that kept us from winning a le...is an idiot. David Robinson WAS good enough to win an NBA le and then some...it was the Spurs that weren't.

  3. #78
    Tim to Tony to Manu! bdictjames's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    5,686
    I thought we were only talking about one-on-one? If that's the case then David would have won.

    But team basketball is a different story. I'd pick Tim.. and one would be an idiot to not pick the smarter one. He's the cornerstone of both offense and defense of the San Antonio Spurs.

  4. #79
    Veteran dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    20,159
    I'm saying that doesn't mean he'd beat him in a game of one on one. As you are trying to argue that it does...
    No i said that would be very close. They would both get games off eachother. If Duncan is locked in his low post game it is a nightmare to handle and he will win. If D-Rob is locked in he will use his strengths as an athlete and skill to win. I never said Duncan would dominate David one on one like you are saying David would over Tim.

  5. #80
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    So, how about those Suns? I tell you...you sure can tell how a bigman impacts a team
    How about those 2000 Suns when Duncan was injured and missed the playoffs?

  6. #81
    Veteran dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    20,159
    I thought we were only talking about one-on-one? If that's the case then David would have won.

    But team basketball is a different story. I'd pick Tim.. and one would be an idiot to not pick the smarter one. He's the cornerstone of both offense and defense of the San Antonio Spurs.
    Right but i think one on one it is close. In a team game i am taking Tim every single time.

  7. #82
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002
    This is David dunking all over a two time DPOY:

    Code:
               Charlotte (111) @ San Antonio (124) 01/16/93
    
    
    Charlotte (111)
    
                    POS MIN FGM-FGA FTM-FTA TGM-TGA ORB-TRB AS ST BL TO PF  TP
    Johnson,Larry     F  42   6-16    5- 8    1- 3    1-14   4  1  0  3  2  18
    Newman,Johnny     F  14   1- 1    5- 6    0- 0    1- 1   0  0  0  0  4   7
    Mourning,Alonzo   C  32   9-20    6-10    0- 0    2- 5   0  0  4  2  5  24
    Bogues,Muggsy     G  34   3- 7    5- 6    0- 0    1- 6   7  0  0  3  2  11
    Gill,Kendall      G  40   6-16    4- 6    0- 0    1- 4   2  4  0  1  1  16
    Gattison,Kenny       15   0- 1    1- 2    0- 0    0- 2   2  0  1  0  5   1
    Wingate,David        21   3- 6    1- 2    0- 1    3- 3   0  2  1  1  0   7
    Curry,Dell           26   7-12    0- 0    1- 1    0- 1   2  1  0  1  1  15
    Bennett,Tony         14   4- 6    2- 3    2- 3    0- 0   2  1  0  0  2  12
    Hammonds,Tom          2   0- 0    0- 0    0- 0    0- 2   0  0  0  0  0   0
    TOTALS              240  39-85   29-43    4- 8    9-38  19  9  6 11 22 111
    
        FG %: .459  FT %: .674  Three %: .500  Team Rebs: 17  Team TOs: 0
    
    
    San Antonio (124)
    
                    POS MIN FGM-FGA FTM-FTA TGM-TGA ORB-TRB AS ST BL TO PF  TP
    Ellis,Dale        F  38   9-17    0- 0    3- 6    2- 6   4  0  0  1  2  21
    Carr,Antoine      F  15   5- 6    2- 3    0- 0    0- 2   2  0  3  0  6  12
    Robinson,David    C  40  20-28   11-15    1- 2    3-14   3  0  7  2  3  52
    Johnson,Avery     G  32   2- 4    0- 0    0- 0    0- 0  12  1  0  1  4   4
    Del Negro,Vinny   G  36   6-14    2- 2    0- 1    2- 7   3  1  0  3  5  14
    Reid,J.R.            24   0- 6    4- 4    0- 0    1-10   0  0  0  0  4   4
    Daniels,Lloyd        17   1- 6    0- 0    1- 3    0- 0   5  0  0  1  2   3
    Smith,Larry          14   1- 1    0- 0    0- 0    2- 3   1  0  0  0  3   2
    Wood,David           11   1- 2    1- 2    0- 0    0- 1   1  0  1  2  2   3
    Mack,Sam             13   3- 8    3- 4    0- 2    2- 4   0  0  0  1  1   9
    TOTALS              240  48-92   23-30    5-14   12-47  31  2 11 11 32 124
    
         FG %: .522  FT %: .767  Three %: .357  Team Rebs: 9  Team TOs: 1
    
                   Charlotte                 21 28 23 39 -- 111
                   San Antonio               30 31 30 33 -- 124
    
    Officials: JIM CAPERS, TOMMY NUNEZ, DAN CRAWFORD
    Attendance: 16057  Time of Game: 2:08


    I know it's surprising for you to see an offensive stiff with no move like David Robinson scoring 52 points in a game...but he did it on a few occasions, believe it or not...


    For a guy that couldn't score...David sure could score...like as in he won a scoring le...I know...it was luck.


    Seriously...you guys should apply for a job with ESPN...you'll fit right in.
    That was the first ever game I watched of DRob whottt, how ironic.

  8. #83
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002
    1-on-1? David probably wins it. He was bigger, faster, stronger and more athletic. Plus, his jumper was better and he'd be more of a threat to block a shot. Tim would have to rely on post moves to score, while David could just drive around Tim.

    As for when they're primes were, David's was obviously at some point in '94 or '95. TD is harder to figure out. His post moves were best early in his career but his defense didn't become consistently good until later. I'd guess you'd have to say '03 but a lot of the aspects of his game are actually better today (passing, weakside defense, leadership).

    The only reason David isn't considered a top ten player of all-time is just bad luck. First of all, he had horrible teammates during his prime. Everyone talks about KG having bad teammates but David's were consistently much worse. On top of that, David played in probably the most physical and slow paced era in the history of the NBA. If you move his career ten years sooner or ten years later and he'd be unguardable. David in his prime today with the no handchecking rules, charge circle and faster paced games would be unstoppable. He could average 32-34 points if he played today.

    David gets bashed for not winning before 1999 but Duncan too would have had zero rings playing on all those teams David was on. The supporting cast and coaches on those teams were just not good enough. Put Tim on the 1995 team and that team probably has 10 less regular season wins and gets bounced in the second round.

    The thing about TD is he's built for playoff basketball. Everything about his game fits in perfect for when the playoffs begin. TD can orchestrate an offense on the low block. He's compe ive, consistent and never backs down. He's also great at adjusting during games and during series. If you want to build a prototype for a bigman that can excel in playoff basketball, the result would end up playing a lot like TD.

    David was just more of an athletic freak of nature who happened to be a great basketball player. His game wasn't especially built for the playoffs but it wasn't like his level of play dipped in the playoffs. It was just the same domination he showed during the regular season. Give David two possible Hall of Famers at the guard positions and he too could have won championships.

    History will show the Tim was a lot better than David but that just isn't true. David was unlucky and Tim was lucky ... and that was the biggest difference in their careers.
    That's my feelings exactly.

    People here may be voting based on who's a better player, not a 1-1 matchup. I thought this might happen.

  9. #84
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    I thought we were only talking about one-on-one? If that's the case then David would have won.

    But team basketball is a different story. I'd pick Tim.. and one would be an idiot to not pick the smarter one. He's the cornerstone of both offense and defense of the San Antonio Spurs.


    David Robinson has a degree in mathematcis, qualified for MENSA on his college entrance exam, used to build TV's and stereos as a hobby, was the best chess player in the Naval Academy and once kept a running total of his mom's grocery store bill, when she won a shopping spree, in his head, including tax.


    You guys do not know kind of man you are ing with here...he is a freak.



    Like I said...can you walk the length of a basketball court on your hands?


    The dude is 7'1 and he could do that.

    He also was the fastest guy from baseline to baseline in win sprints.


    In the Navy, he graded out as the best gymnast in his class...and he was 6' ing 7.


    You think about all those gymnasts, those dude are 5'7 5'5...


    David was an insanely gifted athlete, he was insanely gifted if he'd been 6 feet tall...but he was 7'1...and no one in the NBA was a match for him...not even Hakeem.


    Duncan better eat his spinach.

  10. #85
    I own Allanon mavs>spurs2's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    8,980
    David.


    Duncan couldn't have guarded David. David was faster than Dirk and Duncan can't guard Dirk. And David could have defended Duncan and lot better than Duncan could have defended him...


    As for Hakeem, he didn't just do that to David, he did it to everyone, and he'd have done it to Duncan if Duncan had been around.


    Plus...Hakeem didn't score as many points on David as Amare scored on Tim...


    Watching Duncan guard Amare is a pretty good indicator of what it would have been like for Duncan to guard David...

    Except for the fact that David is bigger, stronger, can jump higher, and dunk better than Amare.

    Plus he's about one million times the defender Amare is.




    That David didn't have go to offensive move is ludicrous, the man won a scoring le and dropped 71 points in a game. The only people that say he couldn't score are people that never saw him play. He could score. In fact he was one of the best scoring bigmen in NBA history.

    He scored more points at a higher PCT than Duncan did through the first 7 years of his career.
    Thank you for being 100% unbiased! Hakeem is probably my favorite all time player and imo 2nd best all time, but I feel he rarely gets the recognition and credit he deserves. Hakeem could probably take anyone all time in a 1 on 1 game. I also think that Tim vs David could be a wash, but i'm leaning more towards David. It would be more about individual talents and skills than fundamentals and this is where Robinson has the advantage.

  11. #86
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002
    Who gets the ball first?
    DRob

    Age before beauty.

  12. #87
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002
    That was the first ever game I watched of DRob whottt, how ironic.
    I think... it may not be the game.

    I'm drunk and it's taking me forever to type but my drunken memory is doubting itself in its current state.

  13. #88
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    21
    I don't know who will win.but i vote TD.
    PS:1 on 1 is nonsense in basketball game

  14. #89
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    How about those 2000 Suns when Duncan was injured and missed the playoffs?

    How about you get back to me when Duncan is 35...

  15. #90
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Hey, put all the subjective and uknown factors that you have absolutely no information on in Duncan's favor that you want....

    Everyone is en led to their opinion.


    But like I said...David was the guy that won the scoring les and the DPOY awards...he's also the guy that lead the league in rebounding and blocks...




    So let me just get this straight...


    Robinson is the guy that lead the league in scoring, rebounds, blocks(in some cases multiple times), scored at a higher FG% than Duncan, both from the field and from the line he's the one with the DPOY award...


    But Duncan is the guy that is the better shotblocker, scorer, defender rebounder etc?



    Got it.



    I guess David just was the best in the league at all those things because there were fewer great bigmen back then.


    I mean Shaq of 2008 kicks the crap out of Shaq of 94...ZaZa Pachulia would have been a stud if he'd been going up against lightweights like Hakeem and Shaq in their primes.
    Duncan has been all first team defense every single year in the league.

    In fact i believe he and D-Rob are the only two guys in league history to be named All NBA First and All NBA Defensive First teams in their first 7 seasons.... i think Tim held his streak for a bout 10 seasons. Do you honestly think Ron Artest or Marcus Camby impact a game on the defensive end more than Duncan ?

    Tim Duncan averaged more blocks and rebounds per minute then Ben Wallace both times Wallace won DPOY in 05 and 06. Tim coud and probably should have multiple DPOY awards.

    David Robinson will always be under rated in my opinion... but you cant hide his playoff failures... i dont wanna come on here and bash D-Rob in order to try and prove my point that Tim was greater but ill point out a few facts...

    For whottt's assertion that D-Rob was such a greater score than Duncan, there were only two occassions in D-Robs career that he had a clear cut scoring advantage over Tim... 93/94 where he lifted his attempts to nearly 21 a game and the next season where he put up 27.6...

    Duncan was a superior rebounder in nearly every season ... especially in traffic and in a crowd.

    Having said that i dont think any one doubts that D-Rob put up better numbers than Duncan in the regular season... what sets them apart

    D-Robs FG% drops from 52% to 48% in the playoffs
    Points Per Game dropped from 21.8 to 18.1

    Tim on the other hand
    FG % remained exactly the same through
    Points Per Game went from 21.7 to 23.8

  16. #91
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,363

    Thats the main reason Hakeem had alot more success in the play offs than D-Rob... his game was made for playoff basketball... D-Rob put up the better stats but i say you put Hakeem on those Spurs teams, they may not win more during the regular season.... but when it gets to grinding out touch playoff environment games with playoff calls...those Spurs team with Hakeem instead of D-Rob go a little further.

    Wrong.

    The main reason Hakeem had alot more success in the playoffs than D-Rob was because he had an assortment of some of the clutchest shooters and playoff performers of all time as teammates.

    Wasn't it Cassell who shot the dagger against the Spurs just last week? And wasn't it Horry who almost pulled off the miracle tie? They're so clutch they can still do it at the age of 37. As cliché-esque as that may sound; you don't teach clutch... you either have it or you don't. Olajuwon was blessed to be surrounded by clutch players and won championships because they were on his side.

    Olajuwon shouldered his team's scoring load during his playoff series... But he relied heavily on his shooters in the clutch.

    Sam Cassell
    Robert Horry
    Mario Elie &
    Kenny Smith


    David had no such arsenal. To deny that would be to misrepresent history.
    Last edited by Phenomanul; 03-22-2008 at 10:56 PM.

  17. #92
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,363

    D-Robs FG% drops from 52% to 48% in the playoffs
    Points Per Game dropped from 21.8 to 18.1

    Tim on the other hand
    FG % remained exactly the same through
    Points Per Game went from 21.7 to 23.8

    That's a little unfair to David considering his waning years are in that mix... Duncan has yet to play them out.

  18. #93
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Post Count
    81
    Wow, why so many votes for Duncan? In a 1 on 1 game, so many of the things that make Duncan great don't matter, like playing help defense, directing the offense from the post, and passing out of double teams. There is absolutely no way Duncan could guard Robinson 1 on 1. Think of how Duncan gets lit up by Amare Stoudamire when he has to guard him 1 on 1. Robinson was just as fast and just as athletic as Amare, maybe moreso, but he was 7'1" on top of it. Robinson was probably a better athlete that Michael Jordan.
    Last edited by O.J. Mayonnaise; 03-22-2008 at 11:02 PM.

  19. #94
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Duncan has been all first team defense every single year in the league.

    In fact i believe he and D-Rob are the only two guys in league history to be named All NBA First and All NBA Defensive First teams in their first 7 seasons.... i think Tim held his streak for a bout 10 seasons. Do you honestly think Ron Artest or Marcus Camby impact a game on the defensive end more than Duncan ?

    Tim Duncan averaged more blocks and rebounds per minute then Ben Wallace both times Wallace won DPOY in 05 and 06. Tim coud and probably should have multiple DPOY awards.

    David Robinson will always be under rated in my opinion... but you cant hide his playoff failures... i dont wanna come on here and bash D-Rob in order to try and prove my point that Tim was greater but ill point out a few facts...

    For whottt's assertion that D-Rob was such a greater score than Duncan, there were only two occassions in D-Robs career that he had a clear cut scoring advantage over Tim... 93/94 where he lifted his attempts to nearly 21 a game and the next season where he put up 27.6...

    Duncan was a superior rebounder in nearly every season ... especially in traffic and in a crowd.

    Having said that i dont think any one doubts that D-Rob put up better numbers than Duncan in the regular season... what sets them apart

    D-Robs FG% drops from 52% to 48% in the playoffs
    Points Per Game dropped from 21.8 to 18.1

    Tim on the other hand
    FG % remained exactly the same through
    Points Per Game went from 21.7 to 23.8


    Tim Duncan has hardly ever taken the toughest defensice asignment in his career...David Robinson hardly ever didn't take it.



    On top of that...Drob had a PG that had no outside shot, the guy made 1 playoff 3 pointer in a 19 year career.....I mean, Nazr Mohammed has made 2 3 pointers.


    The worst offensive player Duncan started with, Bruce, was a 3 point champiion...



    Duncan didn't see more doubles than David...he's had guys like Robert Horry and Mario Elie...the same guys Hakeem had...and Shaq...DRob had freaking Vinny Del Negro and JR Reid.




    That's why he has a nice FG%, go look at what David did when he had legitiate NBA caliber starting players on his team...he put up some numbers that put Duincan, Hakeem, Shaq, anyone else to shame just about.

    When Duncan is doubled and his guys aren't hitting shots A. He doesn't shoot particularly well and B. He turns it over like a mofo.


    And David is also one of only 2 players in NBA history to lead a post season in blocks and boards.



    And you know guys...it's easier put up numbers over 20 games than it is over 82.


    I'm sorry but Duncan was a not a better man defender...this is an entirely new argument that no one has even attemped before on his behalf....and yes, you are making that argument, because this about 1 on 1...team defense doesn't mean .



    David Robinson was never lifted off any player because of an inaiblity to guard them...that's not true of Duncan. Michael Finley drew defensive asignments ahead of Duncan on some players.

  20. #95
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Post Count
    81
    Wow, I had forgotten how bad Robinson's supporting casts were. I'm trying to remember who the best teammate David had before Duncan. Was it Elliott?

  21. #96
    Pounding the Rock!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    506
    Fun question! Why all the hostility, I wonder--there are legitimate points on both sides.

    When people say DRob was stronger, are they intimating that he could somehow bully Duncan? If so, that seems strange, given Robinson's reputation was not exactly an enforcer, and that Duncan has excelled in the playoffs, when the ability to fight physically is a top attribute. Therefore, I can't consider the strength to be a viable advantage.

    The height is also somewhat questionable. As earlier pointed out, Duncan has high shoulders, long arms, and big hands. He also knows how to block out. I doubt Robinson would be reaching over his head to dunk in missed shots. That's an unrealistic expectation in a 1-on-1 game.

    I think the main advantage would be the speed aspect. Duncan would not be able to move laterally enough to guard David's jumper at the key. Therefore, on days when that shot was falling, David would easily win.

    David's size and quickness would bother Duncan's shot, too.

    I say David takes 7/10. Just because he has the edge doesn't mean he'll dominate. And despite his gifts, he didn't seem to have the "flow" or natural instincts for the game, which Timmie has in spades. I know, very scientific...

  22. #97
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Wow, I had forgotten how bad Robinson's supporting casts were. I'm trying to remember who the best teammate David had before Duncan. Was it Elliott?
    Terry mings...followed by Dennis Rodman.


    Not exactly two guys known for knocking down outside shots(although Rodman did try).

  23. #98
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Post Count
    81
    That's it? mings only had what, like 3 good years in San Antonio and those were at the beginning of Robinson's career. Rodman went nuts after like 2 years. Parker and Ginobili are way better than those guys. Both of them can carry an offense for extended periods of time. Did Robinson ever have a guy that could do that?

  24. #99
    New Fang. . . O-Factor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,276
    Duncan is the best PF/C to "play the game" IMO. 1 on 1 Robinson in his prime would get the better of Tim. Too much athleticism from David for Tim to contend with.

    That being said, in a "team game", Duncan is as savvy as we have ever seen in the NBA and a master in the paint on both ends of the floor.

  25. #100
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Parker and Ginobili are way better than those guys. Both of them can carry an offense for extended periods of time. Did Robinson ever have a guy that could do that?

    Sure...Tim Duncan, after David got injured in 1996-97 and DRob's awesome supporting cast puked up the worst record in team history(and 3rd worst in the NBA that season), for the biggest single season negative turnaround recordwise, in NBA history.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •