Reply With Quote
Why else would he have done it? To injure him? If he wanted to do that he would of hit him a lot harder.
But you just said it wasn't right.
How can it be justified?
Why else would he have done it? To injure him? If he wanted to do that he would of hit him a lot harder.
Dude.. Stack looked like was trianing for next years Stock show and Rodeo!
Dude why you trying to give excuses for dirty thugs, like the kind from detroit. What Stackhouse did was inexcusable.
Here we go with the words again. What he did was not justified, but I can understand why he did it.
For the thousandth time, the refs failed to call the intentional under the rim, Nash was at full speed and Horry had to foul. He also walked away cleanly.
But keep trying.
Stop avoiding the question I gave you. Saying dumbass things like dirty thugs from Detroit is not answering anything. What Stackhouse did was inexcusable. I agree with that, but I know why he did that inexcusable act.
I will ask you the same question. What makes Stackhouse inexcusable and not Horry?
Horry got suspended. I didn't care much for that foul.
For this one I can actually show you a video. Anyone knows that Horry did more than foul Nash, but I don't want to get in a different argument when all you guys are ganging up on me on one argument already.
Horry could have grabbed his arm.
A Piston fan, after their history, complaining about hard fouls?
Am I the only one seeing the hypocrisy here?
So you want to compare Stackhouses intentional takedown plus hand in face with Horrys attempted charge and Nashes flop with hands over head for dramatic effect?
I never said I had anything against that foul. I liked the move by Horry, actually. Where did I complain? All I said was Horry fouled Nash hard.
Throwing an intentional foul in a must-foul situation is not a frustration play, and it was only "dirty" because the first attempt met a choked whistle. Nash was hauling ass and Horry did his best to stop the clock. If Nash wants to try to run away with the clock he should be aware that the contact might get escalated with his momentum.
You're trying to make EXCUSES for STackhouses dirty thuggish detroit behavior and trying to compare that to something that wasn't even close in comparison which was Horrys silly attempt to draw a foul.
I'd be suprised if Stack gets suspended. ing Stu Jackson.
You know what I love about this team more than anything else? The level of maturity shown by the players during a likely volatile situation.
Did you notice how none of the Spurs players on the floor swung on Stackhouse, and the bench was stopped from coming onto the floor by the coaching staff? The team is level-headed because of Pop and the people he has on his staff.
Horry wasn't trying to take a charge.
yeah, huge props to the coaching staff. They got in front of the bench immediately and told guys to stay put.
That just shows Spurs are being managed by the best coaches/trainers in the league.
It's Game 5 of the playoffs and you are losing and you have to foul. Are you kidding me? If you wouldn't get frustrated then you are crazy.
liked your "it's also Nash's fault" explanation
R u seriously that stupid not to know the difference between a hard foul and pushing somebody's head into the ground while they're down and after the whislte has been blown???
I understand that you disagree with his opinion, I do as well, but try attacking his assertions. Back off the city smack-talk, that's childish and unnecessary, especially when most people understand why Detroit is a troubled city.
Horry is a savvy veteran, just because you're immature doesn't mean he is.
Horry used his hip and shoulder on Nash moving in a horizontal plane of motion, Stack pulled Manu down verticaly and leaned his body weight on Manus' neck and shoulders. Kinda nasty don't ya think? We Spurs fans get it though....Manu bust Detoit's ass when we play you guys also!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions