Reply With Quote
Every coach in the NBA is overrated. Phil included.
"YOU PLAAAYYYYYYYYYYYY TOOOOOOO WINNNNNNN THE GAMEEEEEEEE...
LLLLLLLOOOOO...
YOUUUUUUUUU PLAY TOOOO WIN THEEE GAME..."
- Herm Edwards
http://youtube.com/watch?v=IMk5sMHj58I
the fvck what KFC man has to say.
Every coach in the NBA is overrated. Phil included.
That one is the only one Pop has any sayso in... And what I'm saying is that it required a miracle for the head to head not to be 2-2.
But that's right... Phil Jackson is a lying jerk... he does have that going for him as well.
ROFL. He always talks when he's afraid.
They don't call him Coach Coattails for nothin!
Exactly! They won't make it past Utah though!
It's the playoffs. You do what you can to win. It's the other team's job to adapt. Phoenix could have adapted by taking Shaq out of the game or teaching him how to shoot free throws.
Who gives a damn what Phil Jackson said? Spurs win it all and no one will remember Hackashaq 5 or even 10 years from except pissy Suns fans, they'll only remember the Spurs repeated in 2008 and won their fifth ring in ten years.
When will people learn to just ignore Phil Jackson? The only time he talks about other teams and coaches is when he's afraid of them and feels he needs to start playing mind games.
I think Phil is a great coach, one of the best ever, no doubt.
BUT.
Even I could coach Michael Jordan/Scottie Pippen to a couple of les.
Maybe phil should start a committe regarding the hack a shaq.......
He tweaks teams that he feels threatened by. How they and their fans respond to it is very telling.
Phil always talks about Pop.
him. Just make it to the WCF and Spurs will try to do the same.
No, you couldn't.
Here, here....
^
Phil is better than Pop. He's not lightyears ahead of Pop but he is a better coach. He's better at figuring out a team's weakness and exploiting it and he's quicker to make adjustments in a series (Pop is good at in game adjustments). I do think Phil has had better overall talent than Pop has had with the Spurs, but even then, he won 3 in a row THREE SEPARATE TIMES. That is an unbelievably hard task. Pop is a HOF coach just as Phil is but unfortunately I would have to think Phil is a better coach than Pop.
You certainly don't understand the concept of collusion. Not only does it break the CBA's rules, it is a form of fraud - a crime.
The Lakers raped the league to snatch a legit all-star in Pau Gasol for scrubs. Your analogy is invalidated by that context.
If the year that they threw those double teams at Timmy in the last few minutes of the fourth quarter to him up, as well as the series against the big 4 weren't enough to make me think Pop's looking up at Phil, then Pop's complete up of the 2006 season was.^
Phil is better than Pop. He's not lightyears ahead of Pop but he is a better coach. He's better at figuring out a team's weakness and exploiting it and he's quicker to make adjustments in a series (Pop is good at in game adjustments). I do think Phil has had better overall talent than Pop has had with the Spurs, but even then, he won 3 in a row THREE SEPARATE TIMES. That is an unbelievably hard task. Pop is a HOF coach just as Phil is but unfortunately I would have to think Phil is a better coach than Pop.
Yes I could.No, you couldn't.
And Im only HALF kidding.
I am missing something? I get the feeling PJ has no love lost for Pop.
If the spurs and the lakers meet in the WCF....I'm sure "Laker God" will be back.....than all will hit the fan.
This belongs in the premature ejaculation/repressed sexual Laker troll forum.
tell derek fisher to do the same.
You belong in the under 20 post forum that has issues with gender.
Yeah, whatever. I just think the whole " this" and " that" is somewhat juvenile.
agreed
reminds me of a bunch of angry teenagers banging away at their computer between rounds of the latest online RPG.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
