Yes, because McDonald has had soooo many more years in a relationship with the team than Ludden......
Ludden still knows far, far more about what's going on with the Spurs than any of their beat writers, or at least will say more. McDonald is a waste.
Yes, because McDonald has had soooo many more years in a relationship with the team than Ludden......
Best possible scenario would have been for Splitter to sign...now it kind of throws everything outa wack.
Vujacic would be the perfect remedy for regulating manu's RS minutes..not to mention, he's the exact spark off the bench that we need.
Matt Barnes IMO is the best option at the 3. He's a long guy that can shoot and play D.
All i know is that Mahinmi better impress Pop at the beginning of the season or he's gonna end up seeing benoesque PT.
Damn, T Park in full Spurs kiss ass mode. Did he have to sign some kind of agreement to suck Spurs' to get back on the band wagon for jumping off in '05? McDonald sucks. A whole year of drivel.
T Park is the most randomly useless poster on these boards.
Look in the mirror for that le kiddo.
He may stink, but your bashing on the fact he doesn't bring inside info.
Realisticly, Ludden was here for alot of years, as compared to McDonald. Don't you have to build those relationships up?
Eh, take a Stephen Jackson Ginobili approach with in ala 03.
Just live with the mistakes.
to give a pick to pass only a round against the suns(thomas was useless against No and LA) .... i think it was a mistake
Agree with Mr Body analyse and i hope the fo will make a good offseason and some adjustments for next year
So you would rather lose in the first round?
eh...i'm not worried about it, i think the Spurs will be just fine without him (it also helps that he's not on an opposing team).
Vujacic (unlikely) and Barnes are the two i'd really like to see...I honestly think a lot of people on here underestimate how good matt barnes would be in our system, the guy can flat out play.
Obviously at the Three: Artest if possible but i doubt it, Barnes is much more likely.
Does anyone know how much money we actually have to play with?
Last edited by jag; 05-30-2008 at 01:08 PM.
The Spurs could'nt have won without Thomas ???
I admit to being randomly useless, sugarpuff, but cannot hope to match your aggression and sheer talent for it.
Cause he's a !!! Nothing more to say about this piece of !
>>>>>>>> Vuja .
Without Thomas, Shaq dominates like no one's business.
maybe but wasn't too much to give a first round pick for a veteran
Imo the spurs could have used picks to have younger players but it's easy to say that
now the deal is done so we will see what happens next
A first round pick for a good center like Kurt Thomas is a small price.
Vujacic? I hope this is CIA in full effect.
If not, I hate our front office. There are way better prospects on the market than that Euro scrub (i.e., Kelenna). Front office needs to take off its foreign player blinders for once.
Vujacic can't even put up consistent double figures for LA, but we're going to start him ahead of Manu? Gimme a break...
Typical Tpark. Everyone knew Jax would be a stud, and he'd still be a Spur if Holt hadn't been cheap about it.
pop wants la to sign him to a huge deal
he does not want la to get better
Hindsight is 2020.
I wanted him to stay though, convenient of you to leave that out.
I say we rest Duncan, Parker, Manu all of 2008/2009, tank the season, and draw the #1 ping pong ball again.
Michael Finley.
Azubuike can play, he's a good shooter and i remember him from Kentucky...but what kind of D does he play? You have no idea cause they don't play D in GS.
With Vujacic, you're talking about a guy who plays behind one of (if not the best) players in the world, and still got 25 mpg.
Vujacic - 6'7" - 44% from 3 > Azubuike - 6'5" - 38% from 3
Azubuike is a damn damn good defender.
Vujacic, I'm honestly still not sold on him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)