Reply With Quote
who laughed? I also linked NR.
Of course they are going to say he wasn't a protestor. Too bad other protestors have already said they had seen him protesting before.
who laughed? I also linked NR.
several months before so he wasn't a regular protestor.
TSA wants to criminalize protected political speech. That's the point of demonizing protestors and protest.
I've got nothing against the Ferguson protestors, you've been pulling a lot of out of your ass lately.
I'm pretty sure his point is that regardless of your intent, what youre doing is what it is. You are trying to conflate the gunman with the protest movement.
It's also pretty apparent that you identify yourself with the cops and shooters in these incidents. Your defensive reflexes speak to that.
you said what you said. I know you'd like to run away from it but you can't.
Williams protested, he was part of the protest movement.
sure thing
Just curious how one qualifies as a 'regular" protester. Is it two protests? ten protests? Do they have a protester time clock they punch?
Probably the ones that are paid employees of George Soros
The Washington Times today featured a lengthy piece on the funding of the Ferguson Negro rebellion in Ferguson. Surprisingly to absolutely no one, one of the key backers is the billionaire Jew George Soros.
Soros has long used his billions to fund Marxist revolutions across the planet via a complex network of NGOs and other not-for-profit groups, the most prominent of which are moveon.org and the Open Society Foundation.
The Times conducted a series of interviews and reviewed financial records to find that the protest structure of the Ferguson riots was years in the making.
The paper claims that the wily Jew terrorist gave at least $33,000,000 in one year to support established “grassroots” organizations that were acting on the ground to bring down the system. These findings were based on publicly available tax records from his OSF, but the Jew weasel was probably using harder to trace means to put extra shekels into these riots.
The Times is literally saying that without Soros’ funding, there would have been no revolutionary Negro movement formed in Ferguson.
Soros-sponsored organizations helped mobilize protests in Ferguson, building grass-roots coalitions on the ground backed by a nationwide online and social media campaign.
Other Soros-funded groups made it their job to remotely monitor and exploit anything related to the incident that they could portray as a conservative misstep, and to develop academic research and editorials to disseminate to the news media to keep the story alive.
The plethora of organizations involved not only shared Mr. Soros‘ funding, but they also fed off each other, using content and buzzwords developed by one organization on another’s website, referencing each other’s news columns and by creating a social media echo chamber of Facebook “likes” and Twitter hashtags that dominated the mainstream media and personal online newsfeeds.
Buses of activists from the Samuel Dewitt Proctor Conference in Chicago; from the Drug Policy Alliance, Make the Road New York and Equal Justice USA from New York; from Sojourners, the Advancement Project and Center for Community Change in Washington; and networks from the Gamaliel Foundation — all funded in part by Mr. Soros — descended on Ferguson starting in August and later organized protests and gatherings in the city until late last month.
So here you very literally have a Jew funding a violent revolution inside of your country, outright.
This is truly incredible. How can anyone possibly justify this? This has been one of the worst disasters in American history (or rather, it is the beginnings of what might indeed be the worst ever), and it was caused by a Jew deciding he wanted a revolution in order to further break down our social order.
I've heard about the council woman and quite a few preachers that were ostensibly leaders for the protests in the st louis area. Of course you have Brown's family and neighbors who held vigil for a pretty long time. There have been several groups from St Louis, NY, and elsewhere that would get on social media and plan the civil disobedience stunts. There are several legal reform groups in Wisconsin and Oregon mainly too. He related to any of those people by anything more than him showing up at some point?
I like to think youre lazy but sometimes ffs.
you're transparent. you're a parrot of corrupt law enforcement, against aggrieved citizenry.
faith in force, against putatively free citizens.
Of course there were positive people doing positive things regarding the protests, but you can't dismiss the rioters and looters and cop shooters as if they were not a part of the protest movement.
You're senile, I already condemned the corrupt Ferguson police department.
That wasn't my point and you didn't answer the question. In other words for all you know he wasn't involved with any groups in the protest but instead want to paint them withe broadest brush possible so you can conflate the good with the bad. That there was a mob element wasn't lost on anyone.
I can't answer that question for the same reason you can not answer if he was a part of them. We just don't know. We do know he was at the protest that night as there are pictures and video of him there at the protest before the shooting.
Saying you don't know is answering the question, dimwit. I never said 'answer the question correctly or die!"
Thank you for making my point. You don't know that they were linked to anything legitimate.
It doesn't matter if Williams was linked to anything legitimate because I never painted the entirety of the protest movement as illegitimate, even though lol hands up don't shoot.
Williams was a Ferguson protestor who shot 2 police officers, that is not up for debate.
You're not credible. You have been so obviously pro-shooter and always paint the deceased and those who support them negatively. You are doing this here as well.
You remind me of Darrin with this tactic.
Nice to see you finally concede the point that Williams was in fact a protestor and did in fact shoot two cops.
In the case of Mike Brown of course I'm pro-shooter. That piece of deserved it and the DOJ said as much.
http://www.justice.gov/sites/default...el_brown_1.pdf
You look foolish with your head in the sand still believing hands up don't shoot. It's embarrassing.
I've expressed uncertainty pretty much the entire way. I don't know who that man actually associated with for all of his joining a crowd. My interest has been legal reform of the cop bill of rights bull .
I didn't trust the police so I guess I can wave my hands in self congratulation with your link as well. What is important to you in these discussions is petty.
I worry about oppression and you are interested in making sure you can keep your guns.
Williams didn't attend six meetings and get his official "Ferguson Protester" ID badge so in fuzzys fuzzybrain he couldn't possibly be a legitimate protester.
He was a protestor who associated with other protestors as evidenced by his social media.
So now Holder's DOJ report that clearly justifies Wilson's use of force has a conflict of interest? Lol
Mike Brown has no bearing on my guns, that one came out of left field. "Worrying" about oppression doesn't do , be proactive in your life for once and try to inact change if it bothers you so much. Put on your SJW cape and get yourself out there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions