Real 9-11 Research

[RandomGuy]

dude, everything but the steel was turned to fine powder, including the exposives, desks chairs, computers, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc.

Do you have any witnesses that can testify to seeing visible explosive devices?

7th time this question is asked.

[Yonivore]

dude, everything but the steel was turned to fine powder, including the exposives, desks chairs, computers, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc.

Just as there were remnants of desks, chairs, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc... there would be remnants (and residue) of the explosives used to conduct a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Yes, much of the contents were pulverized. However, much weren't.

So, when did NIST change their working hypothesis from that listed in the 2004 report?

[Galileo]

[Example video transcript:]

Government Train Wreck: How government covers up freight train accidents…

"The noise sounded like two freight trains going over a trestle right over your head; it was an ugly roar. My wife said the noise when the house went was like a giant pencil sharpener working.”

http://www.crh.noaa.gov/dtx/1953beecher/storiesFJ.php

[Did a fright train pass over their head? Was there a giant pencil sharpener really over there heads?]

“While I was in my kitchen I heard this terrible roar coming," she said. "It sounded like a freight train coming right down my road here”

"It looks like it's been bombed. There's just a lot of destruction, a lot of debris," said Michael Bartz, a state emergency official. "

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WEATHER...ado/index.html

[Was it a bomb? Did a real freight train go down her road?]

"It indeed sounded like a freight train roaring past us, and when it was gone, we came out to find things a mess."

http://www.offenburger.com/farmarchi...?link=20040906

It came with "the roar of forty freight trains."

http://www.tornadochaser.com/UDALL/reports.htm

“It sounded like a freight train”.

http://www.disasternews.net/news/new...articleid=2954

“Before I reached the bottom of the stairs, I heard the sound of a roaring freight train”

[enter image of NOAA weather map an hour before the tornado touches down.]

As you can see, there was no tornado on that day, according to NOAA.

So why is the government covering up train derailments?

[enter sinister music]

In 2003 Amtrak was going bankrupt. They couldn't afford to rebuild the homes of Americans after a derailment.

ETC.. ETC..

You have little to no ability to evaluate evidence. If typical of 9/11 debunkers, that's pretty scary.

[Yonivore]

You have little to no ability to evaluate evidence. If typical of 9/11 debunkers, that's pretty scary.

And the truthers see zebras when all the evidence points to horses.

Again, where is the physical evidence an implosion occurred? Name one reputable organization that is proposing a controlled demolition of WTC 7 took place.

[Galileo]

Just as there were remnants of desks, chairs, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc... there would be remnants (and residue) of the explosives used to conduct a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Yes, much of the contents were pulverized. However, much weren't.

So, when did NIST change their working hypothesis from that listed in the 2004 report?

the crime scene was not preserved at the WTC. When a crime scene is intentionally not preserved, that alone is evidence (but not proof) of an inside job.

Evidence Destruction
http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/a.../evidence.html

[Galileo]

Just as there were remnants of desks, chairs, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc... there would be remnants (and residue) of the explosives used to conduct a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Yes, much of the contents were pulverized. However, much weren't.

So, when did NIST change their working hypothesis from that listed in the 2004 report?

1100 human bodies, out of 2500 people killed at the WTC, WERE NEVER FOUND.

Gravity?

[Galileo]

Why did the antenna on the top of WTC 1, fall 12 feet, before the rest of the tower began to fall? Or are you ignorant?

[RandomGuy]

dude, everything but the steel was turned to fine powder, including the exposives, desks chairs, computers, wiring, concrete, plastic, etc.

Really?

Then if I go to a 9-11 research site and find pictures of peices of paper and wiring easily visible those pictures must be wrong...


Wiring easily visible:


and if I find a picture of firefighters using a cabinet to prop up a water hose, that is fiction:



and all those accounts of finding body parts are just made up too. I mean wiht all the explosives capable of cutting steel, there shouldn't have been anything left but steel...

[RandomGuy]

1100 human bodies, out of 2500 people killed at the WTC, WERE NEVER FOUND.

Gravity?

Do you have any witnesses that can testify to seeing visible explosive devices?

8th time this question has been asked.

I have answered your questions, you have yet to answer this one.

[Yonivore]

1100 human bodies, out of 2500 people killed at the WTC, WERE NEVER FOUND.

Gravity?

What's your point? That means 1400 were found. So, your theory that ALL explosive remnants would have been vaporized is isn't supported by the fact that some of the victims bodies were destroyed beyond recognition.

Where is the evidence of explosive charges in the rubble?

[Galileo]

What's your point? That means 1400 were found. So, your theory that ALL explosive remnants would have been vaporized is isn't supported by the fact that some of the victims bodies were destroyed beyond recognition.

Where is the evidence of explosive charges in the rubble?

The rubble was not preserved propertly for scientific investigation.

WHY NOT?

[ChumpDumper]

The rubble was not preserved propertly for scientific investigation.

WHY NOT?

Much of it was. No evidence of demolition explosives was ever found.

WHY NOT?

Because there was none.

[Galileo]

Much of it was. No evidence of demolition explosives was ever found.

WHY NOT?

Because there was none.

How do you know?

Did you check throught he rubble?

They found partially evaporated steel, which is proof of explosives.

[ChumpDumper]

How do you know?

Did you check throught he rubble?

So everyone who looked through and cleaned out the rubble is in on the conspiracy too?

Nice.

They found partially evaporated steel, which is proof of explosives.

How do you know?

Did you check through the rubble?

[Galileo]

So everyone who looked through and cleaned out the rubble is in on the conspiracy too?

Nice.

How do you know?

Did you check through the rubble?

People removing the rubble just did what they were told to do, they aren't in a conspiracy.

Photos of partially evaporated steel from the WTC appear in the FEMA report.

[ChumpDumper]

People removing the rubble just did what they were told to do, they aren't in a conspiracy.

Photos of partially evaporated steel from the WTC appear in the FEMA report.

So they are in on it.

[Galileo]

So they are in on it.

define "in on it"

[ChumpDumper]

define "in on it"

Define "define"

[Galileo]

Define "define"

WHAT THE DO YOU MEAN BY IN ON IT???

[smeagol]

WHAT THE DO YOU MEAN BY IN ON IT???

IN - ON - THE - CONS - PI - RA - CY

[ChumpDumper]

WHAT THE DO YOU MEAN BY IN ON IT???

The question isn't ambiguous.

Do you think they were in on it?

[Galileo]

The question isn't ambiguous.

Do you think they were in on it?

in on what?

[Galileo]

IN - ON - THE - CONS - PI - RA - CY

It's not a conspiracy.

It's a false-flag military operation.

Killing people is perfectly legal in military operations.

[ChumpDumper]

in on what?

You tell me. You're the twoofer.

[Nbadan]