Reply With Quote
I was going to point that out, but I'm just so tired of dealing with his stupidity.
LOL... the 'we dont know card'...
Can you tell me how many fingers I'm using to type this text?
'I don't know' would OBVIOUSLY be the rational answer. Let's hear YOUR answer.
I was going to point that out, but I'm just so tired of dealing with his stupidity.
No fingers. God created fingers and since god was here before he created fingers he's not subject to needing them. So in fact your fingers aren't relative at all because its all predetermined in gods plan.
Where are you angel_luv? I would like to see your answers to my questions.
My answer and it would be right would be at least one.
After many many pages of this, she stated that one of her posts would be her last in this thread. That she was going around in circles with everyone, and it was no longer productive. I would finish reading the thread.
Untrue, again. What is required is a theory based on science that can explain how that molecular composition came to be. If you were to get up your lazy ass and take the time to study the subject, research it, and propose such theory, instead of just chalking it up to the supernatural, or 'faith', then we could actually advance our civilization as a result.
Not necessarily...
Still waiting on those references ExtraStout......and no I don't want to see any links to www.NewLifeBible.com or www.JesusIsMySavior.com.
So tell us how you type without using your hands (fingers).
She took a lot of unnecessary personal heat, which is unfortunate, but she wasn't going around in circles, she was, as someone said, constantly moving the goal posts to accommodate an undefended position. Obviously she has every right to her own opinions and doesn't have to defend them to anyone, but characterizing all the exchanges as nothing more than a round-and-round isn't true. She expressed her concerns, asked others for do entation against her feelings and then suddenly developed new misgivings when such do entation was presented. That's not a circle, it's a road to nowhere.
Point taken, I was just stating what she said, not trying to defend her statement or pass it off as true.
BTW (belatedly) Great First Post!
I could have used my toes. Or maybe I could have used my fingers.
Do you have a way to know?
But I want to see what is Trainwreck2100 answer before I post the correct answer.
So she supports cut and run policy.
I dont think that she is that political, so bringing up a phrase such as the above is kind of, well, out of place.
Seriously, though, read the rest of the thread, it's great and has so many twists you would be surprised!
You could have but you didn't use your toes. You were looking for a number 1-10 in the answer.
You could have also used your mouth holding a pen or pencil but you would not have likely spent the time to do it that way because you were just looking for a number 1-10. So the most logical answer is at least one.
Fair point.
Thank you, thats all I needed.It's true, and you're screwed only if you wish to be, your choice, and even though your intent is to be sacastic, you are correct in that salvation comes simultaneously with the request, even if it's right before you pass on.
Nope, because that line is in the Bible and you confirmed its literal meaning. If youre right, JJ, I feel really really bad for the millions of people in this world who have never heard of Jesus Christ.Because you say so, huh?
Im sorry.
How do you know wether I did or did not use my toes?
Likely being the keyword. And I was not looking for the answer to be a number between 1-10, or can you factually prove it otherwise?
See, the reality is that you DONT KNOW what I did to type that message. What's so wrong of saying just that?
Nah. She'd create a poll in The Club to make that decision.
/snarky
I play the odds that you did not use your toes to type the entire message. I stated you would not have spent the time to type it that way and the odds that you don't have any arms is small.
Nothing wrong in saying I don't know. But the reality is you can say anything because no one can prove otherwise how you typed it but there is a true reality and I still say you used at least 1 finger. Thats my answer.
This is going to lead to questioning people's toe faith and whether or not Obama is a foot demon.
@ JJ
Ok, enough of the back-biting bull between you and I. I am going to level with you.
I have never tried to convert the religious to my ideals. While I admittedly show little respect for organized religion (and I never will), I can and do respect the people who follow who show the capacity to think for themselves.
Here is my problem with most religions: their exclusivity.
That famous, probably most well known quote from the Bible (I am the way...) is the bone of contention, the hurdle I will never get over.
Because, according to you and others who do know scripture and its (supposed) deeper meaning, it quite literally means if you do not accept Jesus Christ specifically as your Lord and Savior, you do not go to our heaven.
Not Allah, not Buddha, not Shiva, not Santa Clause, not the Easter Bunny...Jesus Christ and JC only.
So, with that in mind, what happens to the people who are ignorant to Christianity by way of birthplace?
I dont know if this troubles you or why you waste your time responding to me (specifically) every time this religion stuff comes up, quoting some post I made years ago as evidence of my ignorance (you only had to ask) when I have NEVER, EVER claimed to know everything about the Bible and Christianity in general.
To be quite honest, I dont want to know. Not when I live under completely different moral principles that obviously do not disclude millions of other human beings based on their profession of belief to another God.
I think its too simple and quite narrow-minded to actually believe that there are a vast majority of people in the world going to (by your definition) based on those flimsy, faith-based criteria.
Like I said and I will always say, I would never align myself to such an ideal, no matter where it comes from. Its the same thinking we have in our current political climate.
Some parts of America are more American than others, or You hate America if youre against the Iraq war or the myriad of other divisive platforms used to seperate "Us" and "Them".
Im sorry, that sort of thinking and rationale runs completely counter to the very idea of "United We Stand, Divided We Fall, whether its politics or religion.
And by my judgement, of the the two philosophies, I would much rather participate and endorse the platform that includes the whole of man with NO caveats.
Its that simple.
Like the demon of feet, or a sexual deviant?
I'd like to note that this was not about religion, but about science, and quantum physics. Einstein decried it as "spooky action" at a distance. He later realized that what he thought was impossible was actually happening, and walked back his earlier statements.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions