Reply With Quote
We had fun with it.
Wrong as usual.
We had fun with it.
You're under .500 as usual, just like you were the past two years.... it really doesn't matter how far under .500 you are, it's still embarrassing for a so-called betting expert who claims to hit 60-70% regularly....
You pick 3-5 games per week that are close match-ups and I'll pick
against you.
Do I really need to go back to week one of this season and show you all the plays that went exactly as the trends said they would?
No, you didn't. You got exposed as a fraud and came up with the lamest excuse I've ever heard to cover for it.
Dude, I play real $$$ here, ok? I'm not looking for close anythings. Beating a know nothing like you means little compared to winning $$$$.
you can look back as recently as sunday night, or look at how youve taken pittsburgh twice against cleveland because of trends.
its possible that historic trends might occasionally line up with the correct pick, but picking based on games from 2-3-4+ years ago is dumb
Oh yes we did and it was funny, hahahaha!!!!!!!
What fraud can break down am ATS play like I can?
Go ahead give me any game this week and I'll totally give you the right side ATS. Go ahead try me.
You already said you won't bet $$$ on the internet, dummy. I'm just talking about picking against you. You won't do it though because you're a fraud. See if Mason wants to. Maybe he isn't a .
And if you'd played that Pitt/Cleve trend since 2004 how much $$$$ would you have won?
If you simply played against the Raidrers in the ETZ how much would you have won over the last decade?
Well?
You obviously don't understand anything about this, yep...ignorant!
Ok man I have the Ravens minus whatever the number is, you have the Falcons...ok?
pathetic
Yahoo shows Ravens -7.
Ok I'm putting $50 on the Falcons +7.
Anytime I see a guy like you who follows me around I with them, yep...entertaining. Look at how you act little guym hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!! Who wouldn't have fun laughing at a freak like you? We had a ball.
for much of the decade pittsburgh was a good team and a playoff team, while the browns were inept. during those years, picking pitt was obvious. we also know pittsburgh has fallen off, so its no longer such a slam dunk, regardless of what they did in ing 2005 or somethin
So the fact the Falcons are one of the worst road teams over the last two seasons means nothing....right? Forget the fact the Ravens are a great home team.....right?
Right.
Pitt was 8-8 in 2013 but 2-0ATS vs Cleveland. Ok we...FINALLY...saw the death of a trend. But...look at how much $$$$ you won before it died.
Don't act like a rookie, ok? Don't get too caught up in..."one"..game or a couple, look at the big picture/history. Piit had beaten Cleveland 18-1. Now they are 18-2......hahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Ride a strong trend until it does die, it's all about....how much did you win before it finally died.
So you don't know about this stuff.....right?
2012 Mason thrown under bus
2013 Mason thrown under bus
2014 Mason thrown under bus
The fact that you picked the Ravens means I'll be picking the Falcons.
I'm not saying I do. I'm just willing to bet against you... and/or Mason. Whatever.
Over the last two prior seasons or since Peyton/Luck/RW arrived those three teams had gone...69-37ATS.
So who says they won't come close to that 34-14ATSin 2014?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions