Reply With Quote
I also have no problem with the verdict. I just have problems with the case even going to court, with the people demonizing self defense, and the continous lies to smear Kyle.
Cool.
Like I said, I have no problem with the jury verdict, just with assholes who glorify vigilantism and killing.
I also have no problem with the verdict. I just have problems with the case even going to court, with the people demonizing self defense, and the continous lies to smear Kyle.
You are fake news.
this is old and incorrect, the gun was bought for him by a friend of his and stored in his friend's house. The possesion charge got thrown out because it was a piece of bill probably written by a lobbyist that turns out had a giant loophole for minors in possesion
First, they have to make the assumption that the shooting was unjustified. How did Huber know whether the shooting was justified or not?
Fair, leaving this aside, what else I said still stands.
(I already conceded this point upstream.)
so if someone shoots someone in front of you, are you going to wait to find out if it was justified or neutralize the threat, as i've said plenty of times someone who shoots someone else and still has a gun should 100% be considered a threat.
None of the people who regurgitate the "he illegally crossed state lines with a gun" lie care about whether it's a true statement or not. That truth won't change their minds one bit.
Rit.itenhouse shot Rosenbaum IN FRONT of Huber? Huber saw the entire thing and still attacked a person who was defending himself?
Neither. I will probably be running away. I certainly wouldn't try to chase a person who is running away from me.are you going to wait to find out if it was justified or neutralize the threat
What you said is stupid. If somebody shoots somebody else, I'm not going to chase after them. I especially wouldn't chase after them despite having zero understanding of what the situation is.as i've said plenty of times someone who shoots someone else and still has a gun should 100% be considered a threat.
Huber died because of his foolishness.
That's the at ude I'm talking about, you and all your people are saying that everyone who has ever died running at the shooter, died because of their foolishness.
That's the at ude I'm talking about, you and all your people are saying that everyone who has ever died running at the shooter, died because of their foolishness.
Every situation is not equal. In this instance, Huber had no idea what happened and the person who fired was running away TOWARDS the police; he wasn't running around shooting everybody in sight. That's why I reject your "active shooter" label, because that is a loaded term.
"Every situation is not equal" Every unarmed person that tries to stop an armed person and dies have the same thing in common. The previous sentence. And according to you everyone that did so without stopping to consider "whether or not the shooter was a good guy in the right" deserved what they got.
Removing all context doesn't make your point any more correct.
This one certainly did.And according to you everyone that did so without stopping to consider "whether or not the shooter was a good guy in the right" deserved what they got.
Last edited by redzero; 11-20-2021 at 12:57 AM.
According to you, every one.
According to you, every one.
The context is they're unarmed and try to stop the shooter, and didn't consider his motives. Every one that did that according to you deserved to die, which is frankly an awful viewpoint
Don't care. Rushing to judgment without fully understanding the situation is stupid, especially when putting one's life on the line. Huber was stupid and deserved to die.
Like I said, and you agree, by your own words, you think anyone that tries to stop a shooter deserves to die. ing shameful
Nope. This one did, though.
You still haven't explained why ALL shooters should be stopped.
Kyle isn't obligated to let people stomp on his head, slam skateboards into his head, or put bullets into his head. So yes, they deserved what they got. In a different context you could say very positive things about them. In this context they were trying to hurt/kill Kyle after he shot someone in self defense while he was showing no signs of trying to shoot other people.
I don't get it you say he deserved to die because he didn't know if it was a good shoot. If that's the only qualifier that means he deserves to die, that means that by your definition any time someone gets shot because they tried to stop a shooter they probably deserve it as well. Because they didn't stop to consider if it was a good shoot they just tried to stop a shooter. These are your words it's your logic I'm just following it to it's conclusion.
Yes I have, I've explained it plenty of times, any shooter with a loaded gun is a threat, an active threat. They've shown a disregard for human life so you have to assume that disregard extends to you as well.
If Kyle was perceived as actively dangerous they would not have did what they did.
The person running away is not an active threat to you.
No one is listening to you...you whiny, mentally challenged . Just shut the up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
