Reply With Quote
It's a dangerous display of fascistic, authoritarian efforts to destroy democracy.
Trump's delusional and legally doomed plot to overturn the election is politically effective. It's essentially a slow motion rally for Trump 2024 true believers.
It's a dangerous display of fascistic, authoritarian efforts to destroy democracy.
tick tock
His goal here isn't to answer questions.Still ducking my question about which 3 lawsuits he's even talking about.
It is to trigger the libs in trolling attempts not even he believes in.
his despair is delicious.
The rulling in which they lost? BIG
Explain how it will "single-handily" flip PA, Qhris.
tick tock
Chris not smart
The entrance to fascism throws a shadow on us, we're past all clowning and louche swaggering IMO. I object more to what they're doing.
tick tock
So now we send the army in to seize their servers, right?
Locked in a tight race, a Republican candidate asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday to overturn a ruling in Allegheny County that permitted the tallying of 2,349 ballots that were submitted on time but missing printed dates on their outer envelopes.
State Senate candidate Nicole Ziccarelli — who is neck and neck in her race against Sen. Jim Brewster, D-McKeesport, in the 45th District — alleged that the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas had erred earlier in the day in approving the ballots for counting.
Asking the state’s highest court to invalidate the ballots, lawyers for Ms. Ziccarelli argued that the election code mandates — and doesn’t just direct — voters to write the date on the declaration form on the outside of the envelope.
In a ruling Wednesday morning, Allegheny County Common Pleas Senior Judge Joseph M. James said the ballots — which were time-stamped when they were delivered on or before Election Day, signed and otherwise qualified — are “sufficient even without a voter supplied date.”
“In light of the fact that there is no fraud, a technical omission on an envelope should not render a ballot invalid,” Judge James wrote. “The lack of a written date on an otherwise qualified ballot is a minor technical defect that does not render it deficient.”
https://www.post-gazette.com/news/po...s/202011180160
I guess they're appealing?
A president pursuing a legal strategy designed to undermine confidence in US elections, to benefit himself, LIKE WE DO NOW
Georgia set to release their audit result any minute now. Lol Chrissy about to experience losing Georgia twice.
2-32!
even if every single county had to do this (order is limited to alleghany), thats going to be ~25k votes statewide. even if you assume that each of those votes went biden, thats about a quarter or third of biden's lead
nah, more recent than that
Locked in a tight race, a Republican candidate asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday to overturn a ruling in Allegheny County that permitted the tallying of 2,349 ballots that were submitted on time but missing printed dates on their outer envelopes.
State Senate candidate Nicole Ziccarelli — who is neck and neck in her race against Sen. Jim Brewster, D-McKeesport, in the 45th District — alleged that the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas had erred earlier in the day in approving the ballots for counting.
Asking the state’s highest court to invalidate the ballots, lawyers for Ms. Ziccarelli argued that the election code mandates — and doesn’t just direct — voters to write the date on the declaration form on the outside of the envelope.
In a ruling Wednesday morning, Allegheny County Common Pleas Senior Judge Joseph M. James said the ballots — which were time-stamped when they were delivered on or before Election Day, signed and otherwise qualified — are “sufficient even without a voter supplied date.”
“In light of the fact that there is no fraud, a technical omission on an envelope should not render a ballot invalid,” Judge James wrote. “The lack of a written date on an otherwise qualified ballot is a minor technical defect that does not render it deficient.”
https://www.post-gazette.com/news/po...s/202011180160
I guess they're appealing?
Actually found it.
Looks like they weren't counted in the first place.
Lmao
where are you getting that?
report from Georgia
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/electio...sidential_race
and at the very end:
Because the margin is still less than 0.5%, the President can request a recount after certification of the results. That recount will be conducted by rescanning all paper ballots.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
