I didn't pizza boy.
You posted 5 tweets supporting my position, yet I'm the one who doesn't get it![]()
I didn't pizza boy.
"..were coopareting, were colluding with..."
Thanks for playing.
Trash and his crew are totally compromised by Pootin.
The evidence, the non-stop lying by many key people, is overwhelming
Jared Knew
Trump’s son-in-law and adviser has been concealing a Flynn-Russia meeting for months.
The Trump administration has a problem telling the truth about Russia.
First it was National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who falsely denied having discussed sanctions in a Dec. 29 phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Then it was Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who falsely denied having any contact with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign.
Now it’s Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, who concealed Flynn’s presence at a December meeting with Kislyak.
The meeting between Flynn and Kislyak, revealed Thursday by the New York Times, took place at Trump Tower in December, some time before the two events of Dec. 29: President Obama issuing sanctions against Russia for interfering in the 2016 election and Flynn assuring Kislyak that Trump would review the sanctions. The White House, after initially keeping the Trump Tower meeting secret, now says it was just a general discussion about establishing a “line of communication.” That assurance can hardly be trusted.
The White House and the Trump transition team have misled us about this meeting for more than two months. Kushner and Flynn met with numerous ambassadors during the transition. South Korea’s ambassador was photographed with Flynn in the lobby of Trump Tower. Kellyanne Conway, then Trump’s chief communications strategist, brought Israel’s ambassador out of an elevator to talk to the press. Kushner’s meetings with ambassadors from China and Canada were also widely reported. But not the meeting with Kislyak. Despite daily stakeouts in the lobby, the press corps never saw him.
These accounts omitted the Trump Tower meeting, which Kushner knew about. Yet the White House didn’t correct them.
Pence now claims that when he gave that interview, he didn’t know his statements about Flynn were false. But Kushner knew, because he was at the December meeting. Still, the White House said nothing.
“Any other conversations between Gen. Flynn and Russian members of the government?” er replied: “Not that I’m aware of.” The briefing was aired on cable news and written up in every major newspaper. Still, Kushner said nothing.
Kushner—who oversawnational security appointments, supervised Flynn, talked with him daily, accompanied him at intelligence briefings, and ultimately participated in the decision to oust him—must have been involved in this process. Yet somehow, at the end of it, the White House still didn’t divulge Flynn’s meeting with Kislyak.
It’s inconceivable that Kushner wasn’t looped in on this query. Yet he allowed the White House to issue a statement—“The two spoke”—that airbrushed Flynn out of the meeting. The New Yorker’s story, published Feb. 24, reported only that Kislyak had met with Kushner. Still, Kushner said nothing.
Flynn misled the White House about their contacts, and the White House misled the public.
It took intervention from the intelligence community to expose the deception.
Nevertheless, the White House insisted it was innocent. Trump’s aides told us they had interrogated Flynn. They swore they had told us everything they knew.
Sessions, contrary to his testimony, had met with Kislyak in September. And now we know, thanks to the New Yorker and the Times, that Flynn met with Kislyak in December.
Flynn, Sessions, Kushner. Manafort, Page, Trump.
This White House never tells the truth.
No more evasions and cover-ups.
No more promises of internal depositions or Republican-run inquiries.
The whole mess has to be put before an independent body, with subpoena power and all means of investigation.
That’s the only way we’ll find out what happened.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...or_months.html
Bill and Hillary Clinton received large sums of money directly and indirectly from Russian officials while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Bill Clinton was paid a cool $500,000 (well above his normal fee) for a speech in Moscow in 2010. Who footed the bill? An investment firm in Moscow called Renaissance Capital, which boasts deep ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation itself took money from Russian officials and Putin-connected oligarchs. They also took donations from:
Viktor Vekselberg, a Putin confidant who gave through his company, Renova Group
Andrey Vavilov, a former Russian government official who was Chairman of SuperOx, a research company that was part of the “nuclear Cluster” at the Russian government’s Skolkovo research facility
Elena Baturina, the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow, who apparently gave them money through JSC Inteco, an en y that she controls
Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium. Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal.
Equally troubling: some of those donations were hidden and not disclosed by the Clintons. President Obama required the Clinton Foundation to disclose all contributions as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming Secretary of State. But that did not happen. The only reason the hidden donations ever came to light is because we uncovered them by combing through Canadian tax record
Ducks looking desperate.![]()
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)