Reply With Quote
I'm not really a fan of beer... I mostly drink soda but if it's alcohol my fave is definitely:
Guinness ain't for everyone, I've gotta be in the mood for it, and mixed with noodles probably ain't for everyone either (don't knock it until you try it -- although I'm not sure I was in the right condition to judge) but that's not what I meant or what it means.
Watch this.
I'm not really a fan of beer... I mostly drink soda but if it's alcohol my fave is definitely:
My fave is probably, yes. As in, 'Do you like this beer or liquor? What's your preference?'I'm not really a fan of beer... I mostly drink soda but if it's alcohol my fave is definitely:
'Yes.'
Big reason why I hardly drink anymore.
Now that the trade deadline has come and gone and we've seen who was moved is there anyone that wishes we still had RJ's old contract to trade?
Could've moved him for Melo.
Though I was against the initial trade for RJ, I was in agreement with the Spurs' rationale for bringing him back. And given what we've seen from RJ to this point, how he's become the catch-and-shoot player he needed to become to succeed on this team, I think the Spurs are looking pretty good from the short-term compe ive standpoint.
Hard to imagine the Spurs could have brought anyone in with his expiring that would have been able to fit this team better at this late stage of the game. Maybe a better player in talent or skillset, but doubtful they would have seen their talents come to fruition in time to bolster their championship chances this year - not anymore than an ingrained and confident RJ, anyway . . .
Not really. Especially considering the hole at the SF position that trading away RJ would have created.
I suppose benefactor does. We could've gotten Melo don't ya know.
Are we assuming that an RJ on a 15M expiring contract plays as well as an RJ on a new 4 year deal? Are the Spurs still 47-10 in this scenario? If so, then there's no way the Spurs trade him at this point in such a successful season.
Now in an alternate reality where the RJ on an expiring contract plays like the 2009-10 RJ and the Spurs are 33-24 and scuffling for a playoff spot without even one round of HCA, then yes. RJ could have been the key piece in a trade with Charlotte for Wallace and Nazr.
Of course if Lincoln didn't go to the theater that night...
Last edited by Mel_13; 02-24-2011 at 04:49 PM.
RJ has been great. There would be no reason to move him. I guess the only drawback is that it gave the Spurs enough cap space to re-sign Bonner.
You can't just leave us hanging like that Obi!
Didn't seem like the right thread to discuss a more enlightened version of Reconstruction...You can't just leave us hanging like that Obi!
This thread is ing epic!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
