Reply With Quote
What does that have to do with Trump, Chris?
What does that have to do with Trump, Chris?
You didn't watch it.
lol cynical Atheist Blake
It looks stupid. And it also looks like just a ding.
Ayanna Pressley, Dem backed by Ocasio-Cortez, upsets Michael Capuano in Massachusetts House primary
"I think it’s embarrassing for the country to allow protesters"
-- Trump
lol
Congrats? Now we watch him lose by 20.
It's really a worst case scenario for the GOP that Trump is still popular enough among Republican voters that he can dictate who wins Primaries, but so unpopular with the rest of voters that his choices are at a huge disadvantage in the general elections.
if someone is in congress watching the hearing stands up and yells at their top of their lungs they should be taken out and thrown in jail
So you want Laura Loomer to rot in jail?
lol OK
The result is a two-track presidency.
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
Back to this soap opera:
Wonder what Qanon/Ranon’s take is
There's an Ranon now?
You ruined my WH stream of consciousness posting you
Where’ve you been?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.red...ampf=undefined
Oh, JFK JunioRanon.
Didn't hear it by det name.
But yeah, may have to visit AR15.com to find out.
Trump quickly lashed out on Wednesday, dismissing the op-ed as "really a disgrace" and "gutless" and assailing the author and The New York Times for publishing the anonymous opinion piece.
"We have somebody in what I call the failing New York Times that's talking about he's part of the resistance inside the Trump administration," Trump said. "This is what we have to deal with. And you know the dishonest media ... But it's really a disgrace."
Multi tiered lol
Failing NYT
Dishonest op-ed piece
The best people
NYT published that piece without exposing the author, but I'm sure they know who the author is, and that person will be known eventually.
Trump is on that recording telling Woodward:"I know you have been fair"
lol
How dumb?
One word: DUCKS
There are currently 30 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 30 guests)
Posting Permissions
