A cautionary glimpse into the social problems abortion can produce

[ElNono]

Nice detective work elnono

Detective work? It's bolded right after the le, as a summary of the article's contents.

except that Zugibe and the "creator" aren't one and the same. Find where the "creator" did the scientific research and you have a point.
A copy of that in PDF form will suffice.

Weak attempt to change the subject. It doesn't matter who 'the creator' is. What we're discussing here is wether what you posted is opinion or fact. And it's clearly opinion, as stated in the do ent itself. C'mon, you know very well how the scientific method works. People throw theories (which is nothing but opinions) and then proceed to verify the claims of those theories. If all claims are verified, then it becomes a scientific law (and fact). Thus, my request for the 'Scientific Law of Human Life'. Still waiting for you to produce that do ent.

[101A]

We aren't doing anything. It's up to the person in whom the "person" resides. Still waitin on all those pro-"lifers" to come forward and say whether they are for capital punishment.

I'm not for capital punishment.

The reasoning, however, is completely unrelated to why I am opposed to abortion.

[RandomGuy]

I am generally against abortion, but oppose criminalisation of the procedure.

An interesting allegory to the whole debate can be seen here where studies show a drop in crime rates 18 years after abortion is legalized.

[Shastafarian]

What's the reason then?

[2centsworth]

Anyone going to attempt to argue against the science JJ has presented? I know it's complex, but what does the science say in your own words.

[Shastafarian]

Anyone going to attempt to argue against the science JJ has presented? I know it's complex, but what does the science say in your own words.

I would attempt it but golly-gee-whiz I just don't understand all those big words. JJ, can you explain the science to us? Then I'm sure we'd be more than willing to argue against it.

[ElNono]

Anyone going to attempt to argue against the science JJ has presented? I know it's complex, but what does the science say in your own words.

It was already debunked in this post:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...0&postcount=76

Different scientists with different backgrounds have different theories of when does life begins.

Perhaps you didn't read the thread in it's entirety?

And FWIW, I'm actually against abortion, with the sole exception being rape cases.