Because it's a lot of trouble to go through, and evil people have budgets and payrolls too.
You're s . You hate America.
Because it's a lot of trouble to go through, and evil people have budgets and payrolls too.
did you see anyone putting bombs in the Seattle Kingdome?
That's it! You've found the smoking gun! Success at last. Congratulations on crackin' the case.![]()
WTC 7 was loaded with explosives. FL93 was supposed to ram into it, but never made it.
Why would you leave a giant building sittting there loaded with explosives? Wouldn't someone find them eventually?
Who's saying that wasn't a controlled demolition?
Try again.
That is very well do ented. we actually have people who admit to planting those charges as well as hundreds of witnesses.
that's an awful lot of trouble to go through just to do it for the of it....
and saying "evil people" suggests they did it for a an "evil motive."
Is Silverstein behind it when he says "pull it"? Is he just crazy or evil?
If he's evil, what's his motive?
Why don't you and your brain dead pals stop asking so many questions and start answering a few?
You are saying it. You claim that if no one sees someone planting the bombs, then it's not a controlled demolition.
9/11 is also well do ented.
Proof?
Wouldn't someone find evidence of detonation eventually?Why would you leave a giant building sittting there loaded with explosives? Wouldn't someone find them eventually?
Who put the explosives there? How did they get there unnoticed?
What crazy person would go after WTC 7?
After all we know jet fuel can melt steel and stay burning weeks later.......
"prisonplanet is a great internet site for all of your conspiracy needs.
Need a quick quote from some obscure worker about the explosions he heard? No problem.
Looking for shady video testimony from Silverstein? We have it here.
Researching the Bush family involvement in the towers coming down? It is all right here."
You are dense.
Well "stacie",
the few that have been answered, you and your "pals" don't seem to like the answers.
Why are you so afraid to give your summarization as to what exactly happened......who did it, how did they do it, and why did they do it.
Names would be fine for who did it. 1-2 sentences for how they did it and 1-2 sentences for why.
It's not like you are being asked to explain oxygen molecules even though you are acting like it.
This has been answered but you don't like the answer.
Now how about you tell us what happened?
The magic jet fuel.
Creates a giant fireball outside.
Starts a massive fire at the top.
Goes 1000 feet down to start explosions in the basement.
Takes down WTC 7.
Wouldn't someone find at least one piece of steel from WTC 7 eventually?
If it was loaded with explosives, why did they bring down the building via controlled demolition? Wouldn't it be enough to just let the explosives go off?
No. The federal Post office was next door, they did not want to damage it.
How much pot does your average twoofer smoke?
By the posts in this thead, I'd say quite a bit.
So Bush wanted to kill three thousand American civilians, destroy several billion dollars of property, cripple the economy and the airline industry, but wanted to make sure the post office was safe? You actually have an easier time believing that than that building 7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing buildings across the street from it?![]()
That's the priorities of an evil person. I find it hard to understand, too.
I know these "black ops" guys are super smart and everything, but, if I were to stage a fake terrorist attack, why would I bother with hijacked planes?
Wasn't the WTC actually BOMBED in 1993? Why not just plant bombs all over the place in towers 1 and 2? And why bother with rinky-dink WTC7 when you've just destroyed WTC1 and 2?
Why weren't other small buildings in the area also "pulled"?
It just doesn't make any sense. But then again, all of this is so far fetched it makes the OJ frame job seem plausible by comparison.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)