I'm with O_V.
Most of us C.O.H. members aren't suggesting that Hairston is an All-Star in waiting or the difference-maker, just that he might of made a difference in a game, had he been given the opportunity to develop over the season.
After Manu went down, the writing was on the wall. Pop said as much before Manu went down for good. As banged up as Tim was and the type of load Tony was going to be forced to carry for as long as their playoff continued, it was probably better they didn't beat the Mavs.
Having said that, who killed the Spurs in that series?
You think the Spurs could have used another option to throw at Howard?
Again, not saying Hairston would've been the difference between winning and losing against the Mavs, but if you're a team admittedly not capable of winning a le, why wouldn't you try to develop players that have displayed enough potential to maybe supplant some of the vets that are no longer capable of getting it done?
I have no problem with them securing the rights of Williams if they think he's a potential point-forward prospect (in fact, I'm all for it) but why would you then cut Hairston when you've got a vet like Vaughn at the end of the bench.
I've got nothing against Vaughn but him being on the team doesn't even provide insurance once Manu's out of the picture. , let him sit on the bench as a coach, ala Avery's last season in Dallas, but don't let him take the spot of a prospect who might actually help you at some point.
I understand Pop and the staff not wanting to completely tank it with Tim and Tony playing there asses off, and I even somewhat admire it, but if it's at the expense of next season it really makes no sense.
Hill being relegated to the bench and Malik not ever being given the chance to succeed was just flat-out maddening.