Reply With Quote
Didn't they just add that not too long ago?
Kind of figured this game would end the way the first one did...the better team found a way to win though they didn't play well. That's what's frustrating but then again, that's what separates good teams from bad teams....good teams always find a way to win.
I figured this game would be a blow out but Raiders came to play...too bad moral victories don't count.
Didn't they just add that not too long ago?
the Chargers.Replay from reverse angle was shown along with explaination that this year the recievers must come down with not only the feet but must maintain ball control on the landing also. The angle showed the ball move as he hit the ground.
Tough break for Raiders but correct call.
You've got to beat Norvron Turner when he gives you 5 million chances to do so. I have a feeling the db who screwed up on the coverage was Cromarte and not the rookie. Cromarte will die before he'll own up and Norvron will not discipline him one iota.
Condolences.
As Charger far at least we got to see Sproiles in crunch time instead of LT.
The right call!!!
If the ing receivers would have helped Jamarcus out when he was actually playing well early, they wouldn't have been in this position. They clearly had trouble getting out of jams on timed routes... something a guy like Crabtree could have changed.
Oh well, for the most part, the Raiders played well, and really outplayed the Chargers all around. It was nice to see, but a real heartbreaker.
They still have more rings than the Chargers or Colts, so the Chargers and Colts.
That's our point. The inconsistency of the call is ing insane. The inconsistency of the officiating PERIOD, over the past couple years (ESPECIALLY last year) has been ridiculous.
No, it was in the NFL for a while and then you always heard the refs say "the receiver did not make a football move". Then you'd get the broadcaster say "What is a football move anyways?". It's been gone for at least 2 years, I think.
Nah, same thing happens on sideline plays all the time.
This is a few years old, but same type of play in the endzone:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/200601...eers#tab:watch
Damn they've been owned by the Chargers for 6 straight years.
It's around 1:40.
I am already prepared to call DHB a bust.the Chargers.
If the ing receivers would have helped Jamarcus out when he was actually playing well early, they wouldn't have been in this position. They clearly had trouble getting out of jams on timed routes... something a guy like Crabtree could have changed.
Oh well, for the most part, the Raiders played well, and really outplayed the Chargers all around. It was nice to see, but a real heartbreaker.
They still have more rings than the Chargers or Colts, so the Chargers and Colts.
And for Assface to be the best cb in the league, he looked pretty ty on that Vincent Jackson td.
So if a running back in the field of play only has to reach the ball over the plain, it's a TD ... even if the ball gets knocked out of his hand and losses possesion. I don't get it.
That pissed the out of me, that a horrible ing throw like that, somehow Jackson got lucky that he just happened to be off balance on his route, allowing him to fall back and catch that .
That pissed me off to .
Completely different as the RB already has possession of the ball.
Exactly.
Refs are bull . So are the gots who defend this .
Um yeah, he never had that secured the way Murphy did. It was sliding around his arms the whole time. Murphy had it secure until his ass hit the ground. Completely different.
So did Murphy. Both feet on the ground, and took a hit. Ball didn't move until his hip hit the ground.
Again, my main issue is the inconsistency of this call, as this happens often, and has many times gotten called in favor of the offense. The NFL has gotten way to inconsistent with their officiating, and is starting to head toward the level of NBA officiating. Maybe they need to get rid of these old refs and get some young blood in there, just like I feel the NBA needs to do.
How is it completely different. Murphy clearly had possesion when he came down, both feet touch the ground, landed on his ass then ball came lose.
Well I can't hate on the Raiders they put up a pretty damn good fight so props to them, but the D let them down there at the end.
They'll never be consistent and I disagree about the O getting the benefit of the doubt most of the time.
From what I've seen, they usually favor the better team.
Shockey's 2nd TD yesterday was much more questionable and they upheld the TD call.
Poor raiders/raider fans. What am i saying, I don't feel bad at all, im a huge charger fan so you raiders, hahahahhahhahaha. Get owned 12 times in a row-will no doubt be 13 when they go to SD. As for the Chargers, they played pretty awful, but did the important thing which is got the W. If only the damn patriots lost-need homefield in POs. Lots of good teams were rusty this week, chargers included. The D in the first half looked ty, but played a lot better in the 2nd half besides the horrible play by Hart on the 4th down TD pass-wtf was that hart-they need to bench him-just ridiculous. The o-line needs to play much better.
Raiders D is improved definitely, but holy on that last drive they just looked awful. You can't keep giving easy check down passes to sproles, naanee, etc. They didn't adapt well at all, but I was pretty confident rivers would do what was needed to get the TD=and he did. Da raiderzzzzz fail again-the look on some of the fans was pretty priceless after the sproles TD. Go Chargers
talk when the chargers actually win something that matters, brah
lol 3>0
lol 54 to 42 all time
lol patriots
lol steelers
lol LT
lol playoff nut-ups
my favorite part of the game was LT on the sidelines for the last drive, showing fake happiness for Sproles. He probably has some "no pouting" clause in his new contract, cuz he was fighting like to keep from looking emo.
So are you going to go all unabomber today?
Just remember, the Chargers are a classy team. LdT said so.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
