Reply With Quote
that's a good one.
It was an airplane.
How bout a youtube...
On the right the "mystery missile". On the left a pic of America West Flight 808 taken 24 hours later traveling the same route.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/...?asid=6a12aadf
Hadn't heard about the "blue dots." What'd those turn out to be?
your petrified imagination. lol
It took more effort to write this post than to post a link. Therefore I'm going to eliminate lazy and go with dishonest.
D'okie dokie. Your finding will be given the consideration it deserves.
As I said, if you are reading "intelligence blogs" then at least naming them should be easy.
Since you can't name your "intelligence blogs" or link them, it is more reasonable to assume it is one of your regular muck-raking political blogs, if they exist at all.
You do not have to post them on my say so, as you noted.
But the longer you refuse, the more you look like a fool.
That suits me just fine.
Generally, I take people at their word when they state something. It is logical to do so.
Yonivore, you are the exception to the "generally". You are the worst kind of judgmental political hack, with a proven record of intellectual dishonesty.
You would say anything, and make any point, no matter how specious or patently unfair to advance your political views.
I try to stay out of your threads for the general reason that I feel dumber for having read them, and given that I have read some pretty ed stuff from other conspiracy theorists, that is saying a lot.
And, yet, here you are.
The longer you demand I source an opinion, the more you look like a petty fool trying to make some petty point. It's become a matter of principle. If I thought anything in that post required sourcing, I would have sourced it.
Exactly what in the post, that's got your panties in a wad, needs verifying?
Again, what suits you does not concern me.
(sighs)
This isn't your thread, goober.
I think its funny that you are pretending to be principled to cover for the fact that you pulled it out of your ass.
By all means, stick to yer guns, Tex.
Well, it hasn't been CosmicCowboy's for several pages.
I pulled an opinion out of the same place you pull yours? What facts, in that post, need to be verified?
I think its funny that you are pretending to be principled to cover for the fact that you pulled it out of your ass.
By all means, stick to yer guns, Tex.
Here's a little thought exercise for you.
Let's say you come home from work after a long day and, earlier that morning, you stood around the water cooler talking about that weird event that occurred off the coast of California. You shared with your wife, boyfriend, whatever that, "yeah, they were talking about that at work this morning; most people had no idea what it was but hoped it was innocuous."
Is your wife, boyfriend, going to ask you who "they" are? And, if so, why? It's not as if "we don't know what it was but we hope is nothing bad," is something that needs to be critically analyzed for accuracy or well-founded conjecture.
It's a ing opinion I arrived at by reading a few intelligence blogs. And ,to be honest, when I posted that, it had been quite a while since I had made my pass through the blogs. While I may have remembered then, from which ones I formed that opinion, I certainly don't now.
So, again I ask, what good would it have done you for me to have said from which intelligence blogs I drew to form that statement?
They just want to read your ing precious "intelligence" blogs, you idiot.
and lol Chinese missile
I just thought it was interesting and just threw the Chinese angle out there for fun.
The Japs weren't supposed to be able to bomb Pearl Harbor either.
Why not? They had aircraft carriers.
Seriously does anyone know what the unidentified object was? Nobody really believes that it was just an airplane do they?
Why would it not be just a plane?
Because in the video it looks like a rocket...And because military jets followed it...
I heard nothing about military planes.
On the right the "mystery missile". On the left a pic of America West Flight 808 taken 24 hours later traveling the same route.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/...?asid=6a12aadf
Look! Another missile!
Nope. Another plane. Over San Clemente. I'm seeing a pattern here.
Chump…I don’t know what the object was…But it was a clear day & it caught the attention of a lot of people…I watched with binoculars military jets following the vapor trail…If the Pentagon official statement is that it was just an airplane to alleviate peoples concerns, so be it….I mean its not like they have ever been untruthful to us before?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
