No, I'm saying he probably couldn't file a civil suit because nothing really happened to him that would merit it.
And he can record these encounters with the police without being an uncooperative bag in a dangerous situation.
So if he doesn't have enough evidence NOW, how would any civil suit before he had the evidence turn out?
IOW, would you agree that using this method to bring to light the ignorance of the Philly PD on this law is more effective than a civil suit or a comment to the PD?
No, I'm saying he probably couldn't file a civil suit because nothing really happened to him that would merit it.
And he can record these encounters with the police without being an uncooperative bag in a dangerous situation.
Agreed. I don't particularly support the way he went about the encounter, but considering the officer was in the wrong (and wasn't very cooperative either), I tend to side against the officer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)