Matt Bonner Offseason 11/12 Training Video Inside

[Blake]

Can you quantify 'enough' for me with any specificity? Thanks.

3 years of hate and counting. Youre welcome.

He was directly responsible for guarding him for a good amount of the game. Arthur actually took 85% (34) of his shots when Bonner was in the game, and only 15% (6) when he was not.

Thanks. I figured as much.

So....I never said "Arthur shot 55% against Bonner". I didn't think I did.

Not in those words exactly if that helps.

Make up your mind.

I'm still leaning towards him being innocent of not choking until proven otherwise.

If you want to give a firm definition of "choke" then we can really discuss it.

I think I provided more than you ever will. You don't have to like it or be satisfied with it though.

As long as you can justify the hate to yourself, that's all that matters.

lol.

Well, you put the two together wrong. I've said why I hate Bonner before.

Since your claim is that...

...I'm sure you can look it up. Or you're not that much interested?

I'm more interested in watching the hate happen.

If you wanted to express why your hate exists now, it would have been fun to see, but it's not a pressing enough issue for me to spend time searching for it.

I more want to see Darth Vader in action.......not so much to see him as a little kid.

Sure you are.

I'm sure not. Keep on hating.

But keep on being interested in my hate so I can be further entertained.

Will do.

Who cares who made the question. The response was absolutely proper and right.

I asked for the specific shots he missed. You never gave them.

If your non-answer is proper and right in your book, so be it. It's not proper and right in mine.

So two or three made/missed shots can change a game or series. Makes sense.

Sure can.

Do you think that was the case with Bonner's missed shots this year?

[Blake]

this should close the thread.

Bonner gave us 5 and 3 careerwise in the playoffs when he is actually used. Bury this at the end of the bench next season please.

So you think Pop will bury Bonner at the end of the bench next season?

Doubtful, imo.

[nkdlunch]

So you think Pop will bury Bonner at the end of the bench next season?

Bonner will be our 4th big off the bench. He most definitely won't be played as much as last year.

[Blake]

Bonner will be our 4th big off the bench. He most definitely won't be played as much as last year.

how many minutes a game do you think he will get?

[ElNono]

3 years of hate and counting. Youre welcome.

Can you quantify how much hate is 3 years of hate with any specificity? Thanks.

Not in those words exactly if that helps.

So you lied. That's what I thought.

If you want to give a firm definition of "choke" then we can really discuss it.

You already admitted he choked, under your definition. There's nothing else to discuss.

If you wanted to express why your hate exists now, it would have been fun to see, but it's not a pressing enough issue for me to spend time searching for it.

In other words, you don't really care enough about my hate. So you lied again.

Why do you lie Blake?

[nkdlunch]

how many minutes a game do you think he will get?

Splitter will take Dice's minutes. Bonner will play no more than 15MPG which is still 5-7MPG way too much.

[TJastal]

Bonner will be our 4th big off the bench. He most definitely won't be played as much as last year.

Hahahahaha... what a joke. Every year people say the same thing. Last year he was supposed to be "limited minutes" since Tiago was onboard. We all saw what happened there.

Now the team is minus McDyess with no cap room and very few tradeable assets left. Boner will get his 20+, guaranteed.

[ElNono]

Splitter will take Dice's minutes. Bonner will play no more than 15MPG which is still 5-7MPG way too much.

Completely disagree.

[Blake]

Can you quantify how much hate is 3 years of hate with any specificity? Thanks.

I don't even know what that question is asking.

I don't think you do either.

So you lied. That's what I thought.

No, I didn't quote you word for word.

you stated "he (Bonner) allowed a guy like Arthur to shoot 55% from the field."

I said you stated "Arthur shot 55% against Bonner".

Still looks the same to me. No difference between 'Bonner allowed' and 'against Bonner', imo.

It's telling that you would rather cry "liar" than clear up this simple matter.

You already admitted he choked, under your definition.

Liar.

Not by any definition of choke that I know.

In other words, you don't really care enough about my hate. So you lied again.

Why do you lie Blake?

I'm not lying.

I threw out a simple question thinking there might be a simple answer to your hate. I don't really care enough to go back and do any real research as to why.

I do care enough about you and everyone else's hate enough to keep reading this thread though.....

I've already been called a troll twice so the hate is obviously very strong. It's very fascinating.

[Blake]

Splitter will take Dice's minutes. Bonner will play no more than 15MPG which is still 5-7MPG way too much.

So 15mpg is getting "buried" at the end of the bench?

That's not really getting "buried", imo.

[nkdlunch]

So 15mpg is getting "buried" at the end of the bench?

That's not really getting "buried", imo.

I didn't say he would genius. This is what I said:
"Bury this at the end of the bench next season please."

more like a request. Not expecting it to happen cause Dice is gone and Duncan is older. But I do hope Blair + Splitter will be in front of him this season.

So my guess is:
Duncan 28
Splitter 24
Blair 22

that's 74 of 88 minutes. Giving Bonner the rest, 14. (hopefully)

[ElNono]

I don't even know what that question is asking.

You said I had "extreme hate" for Bonner. Since you seemingly know how much I hate Bonner, I'm asking you to quantify it for me. How much hate is "extreme hate"?

No, I didn't quote you word for word.

So, I never said "Arthur shot 55% against Bonner".

Were you lying when you claimed I said that?
Yes or No.

Liar.

So now you're denying he choked?

Which is it? Were you lying before or are you lying now?

Why do you lie Blake?

[GSH]

Anyone who actually defends Bonner's worthless playoff performances should be automatically pinked for 1 month for each post.

If I counted right, that would be 2 years of pinkage for Blake (just in this thread alone).

The irony of you calling for someone else to get pinked is just about too much to bear.

[Blake]

I didn't say he would genius. This is what I said:
"Bury this at the end of the bench next season please."

more like a request. Not expecting it to happen cause Dice is gone and Duncan is older. But I do hope Blair + Splitter will be in front of him this season.

So my guess is:
Duncan 28
Splitter 24
Blair 22

that's 74 of 88 minutes. Giving Bonner the rest, 14. (hopefully)

so I can expect more hate and gnashing of teeth from you too.

lol.

[Mel_13]

The irony of you calling for someone else to get pinked is just about too much to bear.

Beat me to it.

[nkdlunch]

so I can expect more hate and gnashing of teeth from you too.

lol.

sure you can. As I will expect more defending the worst player on the team for the sake of trolling Spurstalk from you.

lol

[Blake]

sure you can. As I will expect more defending the worst player on the team for the sake of trolling Spurstalk from you.

lol

not so much. I'm not really defending Bonner as much as I am making fun of you severely hating on a guy getting 20 minutes a game on a 60+ win team.

lol lol

[nkdlunch]

not so much. I'm not really defending Bonner as much as I am making fun of you severely hating on a guy that gets 20 minutes a game in the playoffs and provides 5 and 3 in a first round beatdown

fify

[Blake]

Anyone who actually defends Bonner's worthless playoff performances should be automatically pinked for 1 month for each post.

If I counted right, that would be 2 years of pinkage for Blake (just in this thread alone).

anyone who wants to make worthless rules of posting should just pink themselves.

[Blake]

fify

such hate for someone with mediocre expectations producing mediocre results.

lol

[nkdlunch]

such hate for someone with mediocre expectations producing mediocre results.

lol

Spurs did not win 4 rings being happy with mediocre expectations

lol

[Blake]

You said I had "extreme hate" for Bonner. Since you seemingly know how much I hate Bonner, I'm asking you to quantify it for me. How much hate is "extreme hate"?

I have quantified it for you.

3 years of hate is extreme, imo.

Can't really quantify that any more for you unless you need the answer in smaller units of time.

So, I never said "Arthur shot 55% against Bonner".

Were you lying when you claimed I said that?
Yes or No.

Purposely lying? no.

I paraphrased what you said. There's no moral conflict in doing so if the content of the phrase remains the same.

Was my paraphrasing off from what you technically said?

I don't think so.

Again, you crying liar instead of simply clarifying is extremely telling. Extremely.

So now you're denying he choked?

Which is it? Were you lying before or are you lying now?

Why do you lie Blake?

By my definition, he did not choke.

Does that mean I am saying "he absolutely did not choke?" No. That's a rather stupid assumption on your part.

If you want to claim he did choke, great, then I won't rule it out. Explain your clear cut defintion of choking and we will discuss.

Hilarious coming from the same whiner griping that I lied about him saying "Arthur shot 55% against Bonner" when my paraphrasing of your actual quote, plain as day, had the same connotation.

lol the hate rages on

[Blake]

Spurs did not win 4 rings being happy with mediocre expectations

lol

the expectations for Bonner have always been rather mediocre. Obviously somewhere down the line you expected more.

lol lol

[nkdlunch]

the expectations for Bonner have always been rather mediocre.

link?

Obviously somewhere down the line you expected more.

lol lol

so did Pop and the Spurs.

lol lol

[ElNono]

Can't really quantify that

You can't tell me how much I hate Bonner.
Caught lying again.

Purposely lying? no.

So you indadvertedly lied?

he did not choke.

Then please tell us what you REALLY meant when you said:

I'm not really denying he's choked

You lie a lot Blake. Why do you need to lie?