Reply With Quote
Don't flatter yourself. I just have a very strong conviction for the truth and an equally strong conviction against those that try and muddy it. You are the latter.
You can't claim to be even the slightest bit objective when you make a post like the former comment here.
Of course, everyone else on the forum with any logical sense knows your games by now, so it's not shocking at all. Saying, "Oh I'm just throwing out ideas" does not suddenly give you impartiality.
Don't flatter yourself. I just have a very strong conviction for the truth and an equally strong conviction against those that try and muddy it. You are the latter.
One can be open minded but still have an opinion of how the facts will fall.
I see.
Anything that shows a possible scenario that doesn't agree with you, is muddying the water.
Thanks for the clarification.
You should explore the world outside that box you live in. It's pretty big.
this guy just got suckered. s about to hit the fan.
Open minded, with a bias. If contradictory, that is at least honest.
Quit being coy. We can all read your quotes from before. All the scenarios you lay out have a single commonality of either an excuse of exoneration of Cain. Youre a ing shill, WC and its plain for all to see.
I think the admission, if it is that, is commendable. We're all biased, but few ever concede it.
Cain has now blamed Perry AND the democrats for all this stuff.
At what point does he decide that he should have had these things figured out before he announced he was a candidate for the presidency?
Don't you think that is why people like Dubya and Chris Christie didn't (won't) run until these sorts of skeletons are fixed somehow?
I don't mean to imply that Bush did or Christie does have any sex - related skeletons in their respective closets. I just mean that Bush made sure that his records from his
Air Force reserve days were taken care of before he announced...and that Christie seems to be making sure that whatEVER his issues are, they will be addressed before he gets in the ring.
Just out of curiosity, WC, have you ever changed your mind about anything in the history of this forum? Have you ever once decided, "You know what? I was wrong."
Cause I sure haven't seen it.
OK, Cain said in his presser that he never met or even heard of Bialek. So if there is any evidence of their knowing each other, he's in trouble.
I'd be fine seeing either Cain or Allred being on this time around. Either way is a win in my book.
That is what seemed so dumb about his claim. Would have made more sense to deny her claim but not deny they ever crossed paths.
Then again, this is the same guy who claimed no allegations were ever made against him, but then he suddenly remembered!
Pretty big difference between calling someone a name and saying someone raped you.
And while it's completely tangential to anything having to do with the allegations against Cain, I will admit to having my interest piqued by how readily you tossed out the example of a shunned woman crying rape as a response to unrequited love. And even more so by your suggestion that such a reaction is commonplace. How many times have YOU seen that happen? I'm genuinely curious.
(Is there more to this pesky flag lot story we haven't heard?)
That flaglot doesn't know what she's missing.
A truer WC statement was never uttered.
Guys, what if Cain is actually a serial killer, and these ladies are just the ones that got away? If you're unbiased, you'll admit it's a possibility.
/wc
I got him to admit error in a thread, after five pages of argumentation where it became bleedingly obvious. I believe it was about the President's ability to perform some action under the Cons ution.
Perhaps it's close to the same amount of black people he's heard that blame whitey for their predicament.
Cain is cooked.
The press conference today was the killer.
His denial of ever meeting the woman or recognizing her name just doesn't pass the smell test.
Give it up WC...he's now making an ass of you as well as himself.
She said
He said
Bialek isn't going to be the one to kill Cain. She has no proof (so far), a salty enough past and can be cast as an opportunist by Cain's campaign.
Karen Kraushaar speaking out is going to kill Cain. That lady has a good career, a family, never really wanted to go public (until she was outed), has copies of her settlement and all allegations made (which she can talk about since the NRA waived the confidentiality agreement) and she's a registered Republican. She really has nothing to gain from this and can't be painted as an opportunist like Bialek.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
