Romney apologizes for commiting hate crime on gay man

[IWantsACuatro]

So what? Kid got a free haircut.

[spursncowboys]

So the family of the haircuttee said it didn't happen. Have they found an actual witness to this?

[Wild Cobra]

So the family of the haircuttee said it didn't happen. Have they found an actual witness to this?

lol...

Why doesn't that surprise me?

The left is always making up.

[ChumpDumper]

They didn't say it didn't happen.

Betsy Lauber, one of John Lauber’s three sisters, spoke with ABC News Tuesday night regarding the accuracy of the story.

“The family of John Lauber is releasing a statement saying the portrayal of John is factually incorrect and we are aggrieved that he would be used to further a political agenda. There will be no more comments from the family,” she said.

She did not say specifically how the Washington Post story was incorrect.

“Even if it did happen, John probably wouldn’t have said anything,” Christine Lauber said.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...ying-incident/

You're always making up.

[ChumpDumper]

Have they found an actual witness to this?

Five in the original story. You just proved you haven't read anything about this at all.

[spursncowboys]

There are no witnesses to the "haircut"

[ChumpDumper]

There are no witnesses to the "haircut"

Except for the five in the original story you never read.

[spursncowboys]

touche CD. I'm glad these five guys remember in painstaking detail what happened 40+ years ago.

[ChumpDumper]

touche CD. I'm glad these five guys remember in painstaking detail what happened 40+ years ago.

Why wouldn't they remember that incident?

lol painstaking

[hater]

touche CD. I'm glad these five guys remember in painstaking detail what happened 40+ years ago.

u serious? events like these are easily remembered. I can remember some important events I saw in elementary school in painstaking detail and that was 20+ years ago. I dont' see how 20 more years would make a difference.

[rascal]

Really?

There are far more important things that people worry about than being cool with his buddies almost 50 years ago.

I really wonder what type of dirt the republicans could find on Obama if they went out of their way looking for it like democrats look for dirt on republicans.

Of course the Republicans are looking for dirt on Obama. Just not finding much.

[Wild Cobra]

Of course the Republicans are looking for dirt on Obama. Just not finding much.

They don't even need to look. His pathetic record as president is enough.

[ChumpDumper]

They don't even need to look. His pathetic record as president is enough.

You still think he's Muslim.

[SA210]

They don't even need to look. His pathetic record as president is enough.

This

[boutons_deux]

Wait, Suddenly Right-Wing Bloggers Don't Want Candidates Vetted?

the Republican candidate leading an assault against a presumed gay schoolmate, pinning him down, and cutting his long hair while tears filled up in the boy's eyes, conservative bloggers were indignant the Post would bother with such trivial pursuits.

Suddenly the far-right press thinks it's pointless to delve deep into a candidate's past in search of clues about his personality and clues to what shaped him into an adult. Suddenly they mock efforts by the press to paint a detailed personal portrait of would-be presidents by combing over their biographies.

In short, suddenly right-wing bloggers are strongly opposed to vetting.

This represents a curious turn, because as we've been noting this week, the established mantra from Obama's media critics is that the press has repeatedly refused to delve into Obama's past in search of clues about his true self, and has refused to paint a detailed portrait of Obama's history.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012051...=Google+Reader