Fast forward to the last minute then and listen to what the officer (who you think has to protect you) has to say.
There is plenty of data out there on calibers, ballistics, and stopping power, as well as the effects of adrenaline on accuracy. If you are trying to argue that a .22 caliber handgun, which is easily managed by a woman and can be deadly, is therefore a sufficient firearm for home defense, then it shows how little you really know.
I didn't hear anything shocking in that last minute. 20 minutes response time for cops sounds about right.
How about telling me what you think is important.
I already said, I'm not arguing. I'm asking. I admit I know little to nothing about this.
This is your thread. You're the one whining about gun control and the need for an AR-15 with a laser pointer.
Frankly, I personally don't see the need for excessive weaponry and I don't care enough to do homework to see if more really is necessary. I'm waiting on you to tell me why i should give a if lawmakers ban it.
hey dude, ar 15's are cool. they make you feel like you're awesomous max. isn't that enough?
Does it have 4G?
Again, I'm not going to delve into the all the different calibers and ballistics to teach some guy on the internet who doesn't give a enough to teach himself. If you want to do some research on it and then have a discussion on the effectiveness of the .22LR in a home defense situation be my guest, I'd be more than happy to discuss it. You've admitted you don't know about the subject so debating it with you is pointless at this point.
This thread specifically is about why our Vice President's advice is beyond foolish and would land a person in jail. This thread is about how the VP says AR15's are not needed because 12 gauge shotguns are perfectly fine for women, even though the video shows the common woman getting abused by the 12 gauge. This thread is about how much easier it is to manage an AR15 than a 12 gauge shotgun, for a woman.
You yourself have admitted to not even being able to define what excessive weaponry is, so why do you keep throwing that around? Go ahead and define excessive weaponry then if you want to discuss it. What makes a weapon excessive? And if you don't care enough to do homework to see if more really is necessary than looks like our discussion is over, I'm not doing your research you lazy .
you gonna let your gf fire off .223's?
It's her favorite gun to shoot.
Yes, and there are different gauge shotguns and different loads.You don't have to be as accurate with a "scattergun."
do you live on a farm......or do you have close neighbors?
No sweat off my back if you don't want to make your case.
If they ever ban your gun, I'm gonna laugh my ass off.
that makes it even harder for me to see the need for an AR15.
You've admitted to being too lazy to do some research, I'd be a fool to continue the discussion someone who admits such.
No and a few kind of close. Why?
Once again, need and want are too different things. Why do you think you can limited people to their needs Comrade?
If you want to keep something dangerous like a gun, but aren't willing to state why you need it, then say goodbye to it.
I'd be a fool not to laugh if that happens.
of course you want to be able to keep everything you want, unibomber.
Makes it easy to take out someone after you've triangulated their flaglot position.
a wall isn't going to protect against a .223.
Please, we are so far beyond me needing to state to you why I, or anyone else needs/wants a gun. Stop being such a juvenile and come with a better counter. I wanted to discuss the benefits of an AR over a 12 gauge shotgun for a woman, but it appears you are either to lazy (admitted) or unwilling to do so.
I had no idea that property rights were based on need Comrade.
Thought you were going to say that. Well, you're wrong.
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2012/02/1...fense-caliber/
"When using rifle ammunition with projectiles designed specifically for personal defense, such as Winchester’s new .223 PDX1 loadings, fragmentation is assured. Bullets striking an intruder will separate into smaller, lighter pieces and—most likely—not overpenetrate and exit the body as errant shrapnel. All of the energy generated will then be transferred into the target. If the round fired is a miss and hits only wood or drywall, the projectile will break apart into smaller pieces—while these are still dangerous, their potential for injury, or penetration of additional walls, is much less than a pistol bullet or buckshot pellet."
Does she quack like a duck when you ?
bye clambake.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
