Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 102 of 102
  1. #101
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Oh I see what your point was. Yes, we do have reasonable proxies for CO2 levels in the past. They're not as accurate as today's readings for the most part but saying this is the first time in 4 millions years that we've seen CO2 levels that high is an accurate statement. The CO2 record is well do ented in the peer reviewed literature. Scientists aren't just making things up.

  2. #102
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Oh I see what your point was. Yes, we do have reasonable proxies for CO2 levels in the past. They're not as accurate as today's readings for the most part but saying this is the first time in 4 millions years that we've seen CO2 levels that high is an accurate statement. The CO2 record is well do ented in the peer reviewed literature. Scientists aren't just making things up.
    Wow...

    I actually agree with you for once.


    So tell me. Why hasn't temperature followed CO2 concentrations from 11,000 years ago, to 200 years ago, but by you alarmists, they do in the last 200 years?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •