Wow...
I actually agree with you for once.
So tell me. Why hasn't temperature followed CO2 concentrations from 11,000 years ago, to 200 years ago, but by you alarmists, they do in the last 200 years?
Oh I see what your point was. Yes, we do have reasonable proxies for CO2 levels in the past. They're not as accurate as today's readings for the most part but saying this is the first time in 4 millions years that we've seen CO2 levels that high is an accurate statement. The CO2 record is well do ented in the peer reviewed literature. Scientists aren't just making things up.
Wow...
I actually agree with you for once.
So tell me. Why hasn't temperature followed CO2 concentrations from 11,000 years ago, to 200 years ago, but by you alarmists, they do in the last 200 years?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)