OT: You guys see that Anderson Silva V Weidman fight?

[lebomb]

Anderson threw the fight. It was clear as a bell that he didnt take it seriously and wanted to get out of the limelight. I mean, he knew this guy was bad ass.....and to clown and drop your hands? He basically said, come and knock me the out and take the belt. He could have taught Weed a lesson. Even in his clowning Silva showed he was clearly faster and could tag Weed at ease. Now, that being said. Weed is a great fighter, no disrespect at all. But he was basically handed that damned belt. I had a whole room full of people that agreed that the was staged for Silva to step down.

[lebomb]

no it isn't!

but the debate of mma vs boxing is pointless. boxers stepping into mma without the years of training in a martial art or wrestling would get mollywhopped; same goes for a mma fighter stepping into a boxing ring.

i like both but would rather watch a thrilling 12 round boxing match than a 1-2 round mma fight.

MMA has it because you can use more than just your fists. If you miss a shot and get taken down, its over. The boxer would get his ass shaped into a pretzel and tap out like a massive . Same goes with a Boxer only using his hands, and getting kicked in the mouf............lights out.

[UZER]

no it isn't!

but the debate of mma vs boxing is pointless. boxers stepping into mma without the years of training in a martial art or wrestling would get mollywhopped; same goes for a mma fighter stepping into a boxing ring.

i like both but would rather watch a thrilling 12 round boxing match than a 1-2 round mma fight.

1. Yes it is. Youre in denial. Kobes better, no duncans better, no kobe, no duncan. Its all pointless gibberish. But still fun.

2. while I tend to agree with your second point, my point is MMA fanboys claim MMAers are superior to boxers, but they wont get in a boxing ring with a boxer, and boxers have gotten in ring with MMAers.


3. So would I. I like MMA when guys exchange on their feet with the occassional take down and grapple. I guess I can only take men dry humping each other in tights for so long. *no *

[UZER]

MMA has it because you can use more than just your fists. If you miss a shot and get taken down, its over. The boxer would get his ass shaped into a pretzel and tap out like a massive . Same goes with a Boxer only using his hands, and getting kicked in the mouf............lights out.

So MMAers that tap out are little es too?

[Trill Clinton]

1. Yes it is. Youre in denial. Kobes better, no duncans better, no kobe, no duncan. Its all pointless gibberish. But still fun.

2. while I tend to agree with your second point, my point is MMA fanboys claim MMAers are superior to boxers, but they wont get in a boxing ring with a boxer, and boxers have gotten in ring with MMAers.


3. So would I. I like MMA when guys exchange on their feet with the occassional take down and grapple. I guess I can only take men dry humping each other in tights for so long. *no *

there are some good debates and conversationson on this board and other forums as well. i wouldn't call it pointless, doggie. i agree with both 2 and 3, though.

[lebomb]

So MMAers that tap out are little es too?

the more arsenal you have the bigger advantage............

[Brazil]

ya'll really in here comparing boxing to mma?