Sorry, I outed your pathetic little plan immediately.
SA210's family had an intervention about his obsession with a total stranger when they caught him making 100 GIFs of him and made him stop posting.
Only thing that went wrong for you in your little - banning snitch crusade - was that you forgot the Olive Oyl account -
kind of bit you in your pedo ass again and re-embarrassed you one last time!
Anonymity gone forever. Some of us still have that anonymity.
Sux to be you.
No, everything went spectacularlyright. It was my greatest troll job unintentionally started years ago. I couldn't have done better had I tried. Now you and SA210 are trying some rear guard action to exile yourselves out of embarrassment. Only your meltdowns will be missed.
You don't. You voluntarily posted it yourself.Some of us still have that anonymity.
lol
From the main forum page..
"Welcome to our newest member, admin2"
SBM, who was the snitch that had that account created?!?!
wtf are you on about?
DJR210 has no idea himself being that he is totally absorbed in his accusation schtick, thus he is a confirmed troll though he may try to deny it, it is more denial, and his "conditioned ignorance" also confirmed.
As soon as Avante returns - there go idiots - like djr with the lame made up pedo accusations -
confirming exactly why chumpie got his.
They never learn.
They trolled Avante and he bit.
That's the only reason they still do it, officer.
It's not like anyone knows his name or picture.
According to you - neither does anyone know yours - or has your story changed again.
We can leave the Dyer stuff out for now - but you are pushing your luck.
If a peace officer decides to cyberstalk me, what can I realistically do anyway?
Apparently you can "turn" on your friends and accuse them of being non-neutral.
How has that been working for you over the years?
Kept a lot of friends that way?
Huh?
It was just an observation. Not a turning. People can read too much into a post.
You seem to be dealing with the same kinds of posts differently now. Did they cross a line somewhere?
They are completely engrossed in ignorant " " invectives because they don't have enough true humor to come up with anything new and original
Tbh, they need a new writer IMHO.
Plus they are taking things too seriously.
As were you, I was also making a simple observation.
All DJR210 ever does is post insults in between his other nonsensical dribble.
It's boooooooring overdone tripe IMHO.
Well, i agree the repe ion can get a boring, but a lot of things get repeated if they are seen to have an effect.
The insults directed at me kind of go in waves depending on who is involved.
much too serious
Well, we all have our "moments", don't we?
So does that get your rocks off?
Just curious.
No but seeing you tout yourself as a beacon of impartiality, and then whine about trolls and hypocrisy while doing the same things, threatening to bring this place down while singing it's "not real", and then claiming others take this place too seriously is pretty ing funny
I'm glad someone "got it", I was beginning to think it went over everyone's heads.No but seeing you tout yourself as a beacon of impartiality, and then whine about trolls and hypocrisy while doing the same things, threatening to bring this place down while singing it's "not real", and then claiming others take this place too seriously is pretty ing funny
Thank you, I see you in a different light now.
Like I've always said, no one can make a bigger fool me than I can.
And now I guess the same applies to you.
wutI'm glad someone "got it", I was beginning to think it went over everyone's heads.
Thank you, I see you in a different light now.
Like I've always said, no one can make a bigger fool me than I can.
And now I guess the same applies to you.
Not surprising, "the proverbial 'wut' from Blake."
Sorry, I haven't the patience to explain.
Ah the famous "I was just trolling" deflectionI'm glad someone "got it", I was beginning to think it went over everyone's heads.
Thank you, I see you in a different light now.
Like I've always said, no one can make a bigger fool me than I can.
And now I guess the same applies to you.
And that is your idea of "trolling"?Ah the famous "I was just trolling" deflection
The "deflection" part rattles pretty empty.
I would have termed it "infamous" rather than "famous", but to each their own.
Don't bother. Your explanations usually are just as flip floppy.Not surprising, "the proverbial 'wut' from Blake."
Sorry, I haven't the patience to explain.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
