GMO Labeling and the continued Battle

[pgardn]

"Hey, I don't want drastically improved crop yields thereby providing cheaper food which would help solve the world hunger problem because I'm supers iously afraid of ing science"

lmao I watched a docu on the amazon rainforest and everything there plant wise is super toxic because the animal life is so packed in tight the vegetation has to develop a defense mechanism against being eaten too fast. The animals have to eat handfuls of clay to detox all the chemicals. The researchers couldn't for the life of them figure out why they were eating clay by the handful till they discovered this. Bottom line if you go out into "mother nature" and randomly eat you'll get sick and die (sup hemlock) so the re ed notion that something from nature is safe and something from a lab is inherently bad is dangerously re ed.

Basically need to do the logical thing and judge each compound on its own merits whether its natural or man-made

And on the microscopic level there are so many bacterial toxins, wicked viruses, but no, it's apart of mother nature, so it's all good.

[boutons_deux]

Link the studies, not by BigChem s, that show GMO plants and the chemicals they are saturated with, that effectively sterilize/degrade the soil, improve crop quality, nutrition, yield.