Reply With Quote
republican rhetoric is calling all questioning of the government, war, president and republicans, "anti-bush rhetoric"
Do you really think his workload changes? Who cares what they're calling it?I thought it was a vacation?
(See, this is the thing with usual anti-Bush rhetoric... Even those of us who don't really like him all that much find themselves defending him. It speaks to Joe Chalupas points in his thread and I believe it's a big part of the reason Democrats keep losing elections despite the public's opinion of Republicans and their platforms being generally low.)
republican rhetoric is calling all questioning of the government, war, president and republicans, "anti-bush rhetoric"
Calm down. I was asking a question...I thought he was going on a vacation and NOT working, at least thats what the television at my work with Fox News on was implying...He was cutting down trees, riding bikes, and playing with Barney. Congress is out of session, the Supreme Court is in recess, I guess i thought he was going to be out of commision for a month as well like the other branches of government are. My bad if you know he's working the phone lines and email in there just like he would in D.C.
Yeah, and that's why most people don't like Republicans either.
i like when rush and hannity call liberals "elitist"
its like that kid in school who called everyone gaylord s to cover up his Milhouse-like blatent homsexuality
Given that the other branches of government are out of service, now is a good time to be away from the office.
But did you really think he simply wasn't taking any calls either? Come on, you know better. I have supervisors making less than 6 figures who take calls and check email on vacation. He's the President of the United States.
i like when Rush calls Clinton a draft dodger when Rush himself got an exemption because of a pimple in his ass crack. look it up on snopes.i like when rush and hannity call liberals "elitist"
exactly who does he need an official vacation
he could sit at the WH all day eating chocolate pie while Laura cuts chicken up to fry
he knows itll get coverage and he knows we're at war
the one he started
Pre 911 the most a Michael Moore film had ever made was 649,000 dollars.
Post 911:
Bowling for Columbine made 70 million(much of it after his Academy Award spectacle where he made a fat ass of himself).
Farenheit 911 made 223 million.
bush got a whole term from it
and then he got to invade iraq
I am sure every other President in history is jealous that 3000 Americans weren't killed when the World Trade Center wasn't blownup early in their term....because that's always been popular with the American Public.
And yeah cuz...going to war has always been popular in this country as well.
Ok Farenheit 911 cost 6 million to make and grossed 223 million(not counting video)..PROFIT buddy
Link:
http://www.imdb.com/ le/tt0361596/business
Now show me how much Bush has made...
I never knew Whottttt was anti-capitalist
I'm not...I'm anti-hypocrite.
Then you should be anti-politics!
bowling for colombine wasnt about 9/11 at all
the contracts haliburton has in iraq is worth Billions
bushs whole campaign in 04 was based on 9/11 and you know it
neocons cream on themselves everytime he says the dam word "9/11" and he knows it
he brings it up when it has nothing to do with the question hes answering
And Democratic Rhetoric is calling Republicans, racists, Nazis, war mongers, burning flags, politicing wars etc, accusing them of commiting 911 themselves, while apologizing for terrorists and dictators...and then wondering why people think they seem kind of anti-American and won't give them the whitehouse and government.
Guns and Death...Guns and Death.
And for Columbine wasn't exactly a box office champ prior to Moore's anti-Bush tirade at the Academy awards.
It's not anywhere near farenheit 911 in terms of profit.
I wasn't aware Bush worked for Haliburton...at all
the contracts haliburton has in iraq is worth Billions
And Kerry's whole campaign was based on denouncing a war that he voted for....bushs whole campaign in 04 was based on 9/11 and you know it
And Democrats cream themselves every time they hear about another terrorist attack or a US Soldier dies...that gives them an excuse to bash Bush.neocons cream on themselves everytime he says the dam word "9/11" and he knows it
No doubt about it...the Democrats would rather see America fail than Bush succeed...I just wish I knew for sure that's the only reason Democrats want to see America fail.
911 is going to define him until he's dead.he brings it up when it has nothing to do with the question hes answering
they are more racist than non republicans
(in general)
i wouldnt call them nazis but the patriot act does have many "papers please" provisions
and people love to call him their leader, have "my leader" stickers and ive seen a bush billboard with "our leader" written across it
what is the german translation for my leader?
the war is politcal, bush created it so the GOP could say "dont change horses in mid stream"
I pretty much am...
But it's still my country so I just choose between the lesser of two hypocrites.
you did it man
you said democrats want the US to lose in Iraq
congrats i thought it would take you longer to start using the sean hannity playbook
i dont like kerry either dude
why do yall always start scoffing kerry like i give a
yeah i was rooting for him but he was a bad canidate
the same way id root for A&M if theyre playing oklahoma
The jokes on you...Democrats have been by far the most racist party in our countries history, even in modern times.
The Republicans aren't racist...they just aren't anti-white...
Oh wait...I forgot that's the same that as being racist in todays world.
Just do me a favor...go study history some time and tell me where non-whites would be if not for the Republican party.
yeah bc lincoln was a republican and dems take minorites "for granted" and think they need public assistance
yeah i listen to woai too man, heard it before
The founder of the KKK was a Democrat...
50 years before Lincoln, John Quincy Adams, the original Republican(another President who didn't win the popular vote) put down a bill that would have made illegal to ever free the slaves...excuse me, the Bill would have made it illegal to even discuss it.
The first modern legislation concerning civil rights was pushed for by Republican President Dwight Eisenhowser...
When Martin Luther King started marching for equality and Civil Rights the first two white people(IE celebrities) of note to join his cause...
Were American War Hero, best friend of George Bush Senior, and Republican loyalist to the core, Ted Williams. Well that's not exactly true...since Williams was half hispanic...at his HOF induction.
And staunch ass Republican and former President of the NRA, Chalrton Heston was the first white celebrity to join him on his civil rights marches.
The 1964 Civil Rights amendment was pused through congress by Republican Seante Minority Leader Everett McKinley Dirksen.
The overwhelming majority of Republicans in Congress supported the amendment...while a good portion of the Democrats voted against it.
Here is the voting breakdown for you:
By Party: The Original House Version:
Democratic Party: 153-96
Republican Party: 138-34
The Senate Version:
Democratic Party: 46-22
Republican Party: 27-6
The Senate Version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91
Republican Party: 136-35
You know who one of the leaders of the fillibuster again opponents against the 64 Civil Rights amendment was?
Al Gore Senior...that's right...the Daddy of Clinton's VP.
But he wasn't the leader of it....Robert Byrd was...
Yeah that's Robert Byrd...the Ex Klansman who is still in Congress to this day, and held the highest position a Democratic Senator could hold as recently as 3 years ago.
But that's just the white racists...
That doesn't include the anti-semites Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
No...the Democratic Party is by far the more racist and always has been...Democrats are just stupid and believe anything someone tells them...they play race favorites to get votes...that doesn't mean they aren't racist.
Enjoy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd
...idiot.
Anyone can single out a person and then try to generalize a whole group from it. For your Robert Byrds, I have Strom Thurmonds. For your Al Sharptons, I have Jerry Falwells. The group as a whole is what you should be looking at, not the actions of a few scattered people here and there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
